Abstract:INTRODUCTION:: In 1994 a new BIA research project was launched, which deals with the development of a portable measuring system for recording of external stress parameters (e.g. body postures and handled load weights) at different places of employment. The investigations are carried out against the background of a newly recognized occupational disease (since 1993), which is that of damage of the spine following long-term repetitive lifting and carrying of heavy loads as well as working in an extreme trunk bending posture. As a part of the study it should be clarified if the worker's handled load weight can be determined by using a foot pressure distribution measuring system. METHODS:: In the case of a static working posture the handled load weight can simply be calculated by taking the difference of the measured weight and the known body rest weight of the worker. In dynamic situations the measured total foot reaction force consists of a static and a dynamic component, which is caused by the body movement and which is normally bigger than the load gravitational force. For load weight determination it is important to separate the dynamic forces from the measured total force to get an idea about its gravitational rest part. Therefore the body dynamics are measured synchronously to the foot pressure by using angle and angular velocity sensors. The herewith received data are used as input values for a developed biomechanical link segment model, with which it is possible to predict the foot reaction force. So even in dynamic situations an estimation of the handled load weight can be made by comparison of the predicted with the measured foot reaction force. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:: In laboratory tests the load weight could be determinated reliably for different working processes over a total measuring time of 40 seconds. During the measurements the Pedar insoles were placed directly under the foot so that the accuracy of the static force measurement was reasonably high (with a maximal deviation of 5% to the real force). When the insoles were put in shoes, additional forces resulting from the bent shoe leather complicate the load weight determination. This effect still has to be analysed to compensate for it in future measurements. CONCLUSION:: The laboratory results encourage us for future measurements at places of employment. Currently our work focuses on an increase of the total measuring time and on a modification of the measuring system to a portable system without any connection to a computer. A field study is in preparation.

In vivo load on knee, hip and spine during manual materials handling with two lifting techniques

The highs and lows of lifting loads: SPM analysis of multi-segmental spine angles in healthy adults during manual handling with increased load

Comparing risk assessment methods for work-related musculoskeletal disorders with in vivo joint loads during manual materials handling

From Stoop to Squat: A comprehensive analysis of lumbar loading among different lifting styles

Intervertebral disc deformation in the lower lumbar spine during object lifting measured in vivo using indwelling bone pins

Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads

Effect of low back pain on the kinetics and kinematics of the lumbar spine - a combined in vivo and in silico investigation

Biomechanical assessment of lifting dynamics, muscle activity and spinal loads while using three different styles of lifting belt

Estimating Compressive and Shear Forces at L5-S1: Exploring the Effects of Load Weight, Asymmetry, and Height Using Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems

The effects of back belts and load on selected lifting kinematics during a simulated patient transfer

The Stoop-Squat-Index: a simple but powerful measure for quantifying lifting behavior

Ergonomics Evaluation of Manual Lifting Task on Biomechanical Stress in Symmetric Posture

Biomechanical comparison between manual and motorless device assisted patient handling: sitting to and from standing position

Impact of Lifting Load, Speed and Posture on Force at Lumbar L5/S1 Joint of Lifting Simulation in Molding Task

The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: influences of foot placement on trunk biomechanics

Can Intraoperative Intra-Articular Loads Predict Postoperative Knee Joint Laxity Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Cadaver Study with Smart Tibial Trays

A pilot study to assess a risk of a high-risk group of low back pain membership in workers who perform the manual material handling tasks

Load weight determination during dynamic working procedures using the pedar foot pressure distribution measuring system

Measuring Effects of Two-Handed Side and Anterior Load Carriage on Thoracic-Pelvic Coordination Using Wearable Gyroscopes

Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercises

Influence of Different Load Conditions on Lower Extremity Biomechanics during the Lunge Squat in Novice Men