Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

SMaSH: A Benchmarking Toolkit for Human Genome Variant Calling

A Benchmark of Genetic Variant Calling Pipelines Using Metagenomic Short-Read Sequencing

Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery

Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

cascAGS: Comparative Analysis of SNP Calling Methods for Human Genome Data in the Absence of Gold Standard

GenMPI: Cluster Scalable Variant Calling for Short/Long Reads Sequencing Data

Integrating sequencing datasets to form highly confident SNP and indel genotype calls for a whole human genome

Computational performance and accuracy of Sentieon DNASeq variant calling workflow

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data

NCBench: providing an open, reproducible, transparent, adaptable, and continuous benchmark approach for DNA-sequencing-based variant calling

Sentieon DNASeq Variant Calling Workflow Demonstrates Strong Computational Performance and Accuracy

SequenceLab: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Computational Methods for Comparing Genomic Sequences

Towards Better Understanding of Artifacts in Variant Calling from High-Coverage Samples

Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis

ADS-HCSpark: A Scalable HaplotypeCaller Leveraging Adaptive Data Segmentation to Accelerate Variant Calling on Spark.

benchNGS : An approach to benchmark short reads alignment tools

Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

A robust benchmark for detecting low-frequency variants in the HG002 Genome In A Bottle NIST reference material.

A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference

snpQT: flexible, reproducible, and comprehensive quality control and imputation of genomic data