Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Comparing change-point locations of independent profiles with application to gene annotation

An Empirical Bayes Change-Point Model for Identifying 3′ and 5′ Alternative Splicing by Next-Generation RNA Sequencing

Identifying Differentially Spliced Genes from Two Groups of Rna-Seq Samples

GO-Diff: Mining Functional Differentiation Between EST-based Transcriptomes.

A comprehensive benchmarking of differential splicing tools for RNA-seq analysis at the event level

Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for static and dynamic conditions

Rseqdiff: Detecting Differential Isoform Expression from RNA-Seq Data Using Hierarchical Likelihood Ratio Test.

Selecting Differential Splicing Methods: Practical Considerations

Differential analysis in Transcriptomic: The strength of randomly picking 'reference' genes

Extraction and Comparison of Gene Expression Patterns from 2d Rna in Situ Hybridization Images

DifferentialRegulation: a Bayesian hierarchical approach to identify differentially regulated genes

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

NBBt-test: a versatile method for differential analysis of multiple types of RNA-seq data

Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data

Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences

Comparisons of computational methods for differential alternative splicing detection using RNA-seq in plant systems

Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights

: intuitive analysis and visualisation of differential alternative splicing using beta distributions

Identifying differentially expressed transcripts from RNA-seq data with biological variation

IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR: Analysis of changes in genome-wide patterns of alternative splicing and its functional consequences

Identification of differential alternative splicing events with an adjusted beta-distribution model