Distance to the scaling law: a useful approach for unveiling relationships between crime and urban metrics

Luiz G. A. Alves,Haroldo V. Ribeiro,Ervin K. Lenzi,Renio S. Mendes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069580
2013-06-14
Abstract:We report on a quantitative analysis of relationships between the number of homicides, population size and other ten urban metrics. By using data from Brazilian cities, we show that well defined average scaling laws with the population size emerge when investigating the relations between population and number of homicides as well as population and urban metrics. We also show that the fluctuations around the scaling laws are log-normally distributed, which enabled us to model these scaling laws by a stochastic-like equation driven by a multiplicative and log-normally distributed noise. Because of the scaling laws, we argue that it is better to employ logarithms in order to describe the number of homicides in function of the urban metrics via regression analysis. In addition to the regression analysis, we propose an approach to correlate crime and urban metrics via the evaluation of the distance between the actual value of the number of homicides (as well as the value of the urban metrics) and the value that is expected by the scaling law with the population size. This approach have proved to be robust and useful for unveiling relationships/behaviors that were not properly carried out by the regression analysis, such as i) the non-explanatory potential of the elderly population when the number of homicides is much above or much below the scaling law, ii) the fact that unemployment has explanatory potential only when the number of homicides is considerably larger than the expected by the power law, and iii) a gender difference in number of homicides, where cities with female population below the scaling law are characterized by a number of homicides above the power law.
Physics and Society,Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the relationship between the number of crimes (especially the number of homicides) and urban scale and other urban indicators. Specifically, the authors are concerned with whether these relationships follow specific scaling laws and how to more accurately understand the connection between crime and urban characteristics through these scaling laws. The paper proposes a new method, that is, by defining "distance" to measure the deviation between the actual crime or urban indicator values and the expected values of the scaling laws based on population size. This method can reveal relationship patterns that traditional regression analysis fails to discover, for example: 1. When the number of homicides is much higher or much lower than the expected value, the elderly population may not play a significant role in explaining the number of homicides. 2. The impact of the unemployment rate on the number of homicides is only shown in cities where the number of homicides is significantly higher than the expected value. 3. Gender differences in the city also affect the number of homicides. Cities with a lower - than - expected female population tend to have a higher - than - expected number of homicides, while the opposite is true for the male population. Through this method, researchers hope to provide a more fair and effective framework for comparing crime and socio - economic characteristics among cities of different scales and provide a new perspective for further research.