Cost Overruns and Demand Shortfalls in Urban Rail and Other Infrastructure

Bent Flyvbjerg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060701207938
2013-03-28
Abstract:Risk, including economic risk, is increasingly a concern for public policy and management. The possibility of dealing effectively with risk is hampered, however, by lack of a sound empirical basis for risk assessment and management. The paper demonstrates the general point for cost and demand risks in urban rail projects. The paper presents empirical evidence that allow valid economic risk assessment and management of urban rail projects, including benchmarking of individual or groups of projects. Benchmarking of the Copenhagen Metro is presented as a case in point. The approach developed is proposed as a model for other types of policies and projects in order to improve economic and financial risk assessment and management in policy and planning.
General Finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the common issues of cost overruns and insufficient demand forecasting in the construction of urban rail transit projects (such as subways) and other infrastructure projects. Specifically, the author Bent Flyvbjerg points out: 1. **Cost Overruns**: The actual construction costs of urban rail transit projects often exceed the initial budget estimates, leading to increased economic risks. 2. **Insufficient Demand Forecasting**: The actual passenger flow of these projects is usually lower than the initial forecasts, resulting in lower-than-expected revenue, which further exacerbates economic risks. These issues not only affect the financial viability of individual projects but can also lead to significant errors in public policy and management. Therefore, the paper aims to improve the economic risk assessment and management methods of these projects by providing reliable empirical data, thereby enhancing the accuracy of decision-making and the probability of project success. The paper also proposes a benchmarking method for evaluating and comparing the risks of different projects, with the aim of providing references for future projects.