Abstract:Objective Approximately 9 out of 10 individuals show right-hand dominance. The remaining 10% include left-hand dominant and mixed handed/ambidextrous individuals. Laterality, lateral postures or lateral preference is defined by various authors as the most comfortable posture that an individual prefers to assume. The current study aims at finding the distribution of these lateral postures and their correlation with handedness/dominant side. Materials and Methods The study was done in medical and nursing students in the age group 18 to 22 years. The patients were asked to fill a self-assessment questionnaire to determine handedness and footedness. The laterality traits were observed by asking the patients to do by themselves after an untailored demonstration. Statistical Analysis The relationship between study parameters was assessed using Chi-square test. Pearson's correlation test was done to assess the strength of association between comfort ratings of the various laterality postures. Results In our study, 96.5% were right handed and 79.9% of patients were right footed. Also, 50.8% preferred right-hand clasping, 53.9% preferred left-arm folding, and 60.6% preferred right-leg folding. A statistically significant correlation was seen between foot preference and lateral postures and arm folding and hand clasping (p < 0.05). A significant association was also found between handedness and positive history of retraining. Sidedness did not follow any Mendelian pattern of inheritance. Conclusions Handedness is affected by genetic and environmental factors. Since cultural and traditional practices can affect the lateral postures and handedness, it is important to know the relationship between laterality postures and sidedness and the impact of retraining on them. These postures are measures of cerebral dominance and are clinically important.

Individual Performance and Leader's Laterality in Interactive Contests

Automated processes in tennis: Do left-handed players benefit from the tactical preferences of their opponents?

Individual and team performance in cricket

A model balancing cooperation and competition explains our right-handed world and the dominance of left-handed athletes

Performance on Inhibitory Tasks Does Not Relate to Handedness in Several Small Groups of Callitrichids

Individual differences in highly skilled visual perceptual-motor striking skill

Are Footedness and Lateral Postures Better Predictors of Hemispheric Dominance Than Handedness: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-Based Clinical and Pedigree Study

Analyses of the impact of laterality on performances in the National Hockey League based on players' position and origin

The Benefits of Ambidextrous Leadership Behavior for the Workplace Well-Being of Leaders

Lateralization of the Fine Motor Skills in Right - and Left-handed Men and Women

The Lateralization of Spatial Cognition in Table Tennis Players: Neuroplasticity in the Dominant Hemisphere

Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers

Differences in Muscle Power Between the Dominant and Nondominant Upper Limbs of Baseball Players

Lefthandedness could be an advantage in medicine

Should sports professionals consider their adversary's strategy? A case study of match play in golf

Leader–member Skill Distance, Team Cooperation, and Team Performance: A Cross-Culture Study in a Context of Sport Teams

Left or right: handedness in free-ranging Hanuman langurs, Semnopithecus entellus, residing in an urban ecosystem

The influence of pitcher handedness on pitch‐calling behavior: Insights from fMRI study on baseball umpires

Exploring Footedness, Throwing Arm, and Handedness as Predictors of Eyedness Using Cluster Analysis and Machine Learning: Implications for the Origins of Behavioural Asymmetries

Quantifying individual performance in Cricket $-$ A network analysis of Batsmen and Bowlers