Abstract:Humans exhibit lateralization such that most individuals typically show a preference for using one arm over the other for a range of movement tasks. The computational aspects of movement control leading to these differences in skill are not yet understood. It has been hypothesized that the dominant and nondominant arms differ in terms of the use of predictive or impedance control mechanisms. However, previous studies present confounding factors that prevented clear conclusions: either the performances were compared across two different groups, or in a design in which asymmetrical transfer between limbs could take place. To address these concerns, we studied a reach adaptation task during which healthy volunteers performed movements with their right and left arms in random order. We performed two experiments. Experiment 1 (18 participants) focused on adaptation to the presence of a perturbing force field (FF) and experiment 2 (12 participants) focused on rapid adaptations in feedback responses. The randomization of the left and right arm led to simultaneous adaptation, allowing us to study lateralization in single individuals with symmetrical and minimal transfer between limbs. This design revealed that participants could adapt control of both arms, with both arms showing similar performance levels. The nondominant arm initially presented a slightly worst performance but reached similar levels of performance in late trials. We also observed that the nondominant arm showed a different control strategy compatible with robust control when adapting to the force field perturbation. EMG data showed that these differences in control were not caused by differences in co-contraction across the arms. Thus, instead of assuming differences in predictive or reactive control schemes, our data show that in the context of optimal control, both arms can adapt, and that the nondominant arm uses a more robust, model-free strategy likely to compensate for less accurate internal representations of movement dynamics.

Exploring Footedness, Throwing Arm, and Handedness as Predictors of Eyedness Using Cluster Analysis and Machine Learning: Implications for the Origins of Behavioural Asymmetries

Are Footedness and Lateral Postures Better Predictors of Hemispheric Dominance Than Handedness: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-Based Clinical and Pedigree Study

Machine Learning of Large-Scale Multimodal Brain Imaging Data Reveals Neural Correlates of Hand Preference

Hemispheric asymmetries in eye–hand coordination

Using Mobile EEG to Investigate Alpha and Beta Asymmetries During Hand and Foot Use

Lateral asymmetry of emotional arousal as a biomarker of attributional style during darts competitions

Roles of Handedness and Hemispheric Lateralization: Implications for Rehabilitation of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems: A Rapid Review

Does visual experience influence arm proprioception and its lateralization? Evidence from passive matching performance in congenitally-blind and sighted adults

The relationship between facial directional asymmetry, handedness, chewing side preference, and eyedness

Lateralization of the Fine Motor Skills in Right - and Left-handed Men and Women

Different Control Strategies Drive Interlimb Differences in Performance and Adaptation during Reaching Movements in Novel Dynamics

The evolution and biological correlates of hand preferences in anthropoid primates

Microstructural asymmetry of the corticospinal tracts predicts right–left differences in circle drawing skill in right-handed adolescents

Effector-specific improvements in action prediction in left-handed individuals after short-term physical practice

A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness

Sensorimotor faculties bias perceptual decision-making

Large-Scale Phenomic and Genomic Analysis of Brain Asymmetrical Skew

Behavioral Laterality is Correlated with Problem-Solving Performance in a Songbird

On the Relationship Between Degree of Hand-Preference and Degree of Language Lateralization.

Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers

Paw preferences in cats and dogs: Meta-analysis