Speed and contextual information of a crime-related video bias the responsibility judgments

Raffaella Maria Ribatti,Tiziana Lanciano,Claudio de’Sperati,Antonietta Curci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06232-w

IF: 2.8

2024-06-25

Current Psychology

Abstract:Courts often rely on video evidence, assuming it accurately shows important legal details. Yet, studies suggest that video isn't inherently "objective" and people, including legal professionals, might misinterpret its objectivity due to video quality or context. This study aimed to explore how video speed variations and contextual information affect judgments of responsibility in a video portraying a bus assault. The study employed a 5 × 3 mixed design, with video speed (Very Slow, 0.88x; Slow, 0.96x; Neutral, 1.00x; Fast, 1.04x; Very Fast, 1.12x) as a between-subject variable, contextual information (Hit, Harm, Kill) attributed to the perpetrator's action as a within-subject factor, and dimensions of accountability, predictability, criminal intent, and severity as dependent variables. ANOVA results from a sample of 300 participants (60 per video speed condition) revealed that the highest levels of accountability, criminal intent, and predictability were attributed when the contextual information was "hit" as compared to the "harm" and "kill" actions. Furthermore, the greatest difference in accountability and criminal intent scores for the kill action was between the very fast and very slow conditions. These findings raise significant concerns about the use of video evidence in criminal proceedings, as video speed manipulation and contextual information can have a substantial impact on responsibility judgments.

psychology, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how video - speed changes and situational information affect the judgment of criminal liability when using video evidence in legal trials. Specifically, the research aims to explore the following points: 1. **The influence of video speed**: The research hypothesizes that watching a video at a slower speed will lead viewers to make a higher judgment of the perpetrator's liability, while watching a video at a normal or faster speed will not have the same effect. 2. **The influence of situational information**: The research hypothesizes that when the situational information describing the perpetrator's behavior is "hit", "harm" and "kill" respectively, the viewers' judgment of the perpetrator's liability will be different. Among them, "kill" will lead to the highest liability judgment, and "hit" will lead to the lowest liability judgment. 3. **The interaction between video speed and situational information**: The research hypothesizes that under the condition of a slower - speed video, the influence of situational information on liability judgment will be more significant. Through these hypotheses, the research attempts to reveal the possible biases in the use of video evidence in court, especially how changes in video speed and the description of situational information affect the decisions of judges and juries. This not only helps to understand the role of video evidence in legal procedures, but also provides guidance for future judicial practice to reduce potential misjudgments.

Speed and contextual information of a crime-related video bias the responsibility judgments

Is the perception of intent by association football officials influenced by video playback speed?

Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: experimental evidence of its perceptual basis

Police evaluation of evidence: statistical format and evidence type

An Investigation of Perceived Vehicle Speed from a Driver's Perspective

Classification Videos Reveal the Visual Information Driving Complex Real-World Speeded Decisions

Dynamic measurements of speed and risk perception during driving: Evidence of speed misestimation from continuous ratings and video analysis

Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants

Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study.

Moral thin-slicing: Forming moral impressions from a brief glance

Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges

The role of perceived defendant criminality on attributions and case outcomes

'Slow down, one detail at the time!' the influence of reflective-impulsive cognitive style on the recollection of criminal events

Bias is persistent: Sequencing case information does not protect against contextual bias in criminal risk assessment

How information about perpetrators' nature and nurture influences assessments of their character, mental states, and deserved punishment

Accuracy, Bias, and Overgeneralization: Perceived Aggression Guides Threat Detection and Punishment of Female Criminal Offenders

Video Playback Speed Influence on Learning Effect From the Perspective of Personalized Adaptive Learning: A Study Based on Cognitive Load Theory

Dressing the part: The influence of police attire on outcomes in a simulated traffic violation case

Suspect race affects defense attorney evaluations of preidentification evidence

When both human and machine drivers make mistakes: Whom to blame?

The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis