Cost-effective Design Options for IsoDAR

A. Adelmann,J. R. Alonso,W. Barletta,R. Barlow,L. Bartoszek,A. Bungau,L. Calabretta,A. Calanna,D. Campo,J. M. Conrad,Z. Djurcic,Y. Kamyshkov,H. Owen,M. H. Shaevitz,I. Shimizu,T. Smidt,J. Spitz,M. Toups,M. Wascko,L. A. Winslow,J. J. Yang,J.R. Alonso,J.M. Conrad,M.H. Shaevitz,L.A. Winslow,J.J. Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1210.4454
2012-10-16
Accelerator Physics
Abstract:This whitepaper reviews design options for the IsoDAR electron antineutrino source. IsoDAR is designed to produce $2.6 \times 10^{22}$ electron antineutrinos per year with an average energy of 6.4 MeV, using isotope decay-at-rest. Aspects which must be balanced for cost-effectiveness include: overall cost; rate and energy distribution of the electron antineutrino flux and backgrounds; low technical risk; compactness; simplicity of underground construction and operation; reliability; value to future neutrino physics programs; and value to industry. We show that the baseline design outlined here is the most cost effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?