A Rare Case of Acute Renal Infarction Due to Idiopathic Renal Arterial Thrombosis
Fu Zhi-fang,Mang Zhi-gang,Liu Xin-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200801020-00020
IF: 6.133
2008-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:Because of the lack of specific clinical signs and symptoms, acute renal infarction is apt to be missed in diagnosis and hence has a “low” incidence. In this report, a case of acute renal infarction due to idiopathic renal arterial thrombosis is presented. CASE REPORT A 40-year-old man presented with sudden onset, left sided flank pain for 14 hours, without radiation, continuous with aggravation paroxysmally, no relationship with respiratory movements and position changes. There was no history of stones passing from the urinary tract. His medical history revealed that the rupture of his right side ribs was caused by trauma. Gallstones without abdominal pain had been diagnosed one year before this admission, but he took no medication. He had smoked for ten years about 10 cigarettes/day and drunk alcohol for many years. He had no operation history. On admission, the body temperature was 36.5°C, pulse rate 80 beats/min, respiratory rate 20 beats/min and blood pressure 130/80 mmHg. There was mild tenderness on the midsection without rebound tenderness or percussion pain on the lumbar. Laboratory findings were unremarkable except for a white blood cell count (WBC) of 14 000/ml, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level of 521 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level of 60 U/L. Dipstick urinalysis showed negative for protein and blood and normal urine sediment. The plain abdominal radiography and ultrasonography did not reveal urinary tract stone. The patient's body temperature elevated to 39°C gradually and WBC increased too. Considering the possibility of infectious diseases, antiinflammatory therapies were given, but the symptoms did not alter. Enhanced CT showed multiple ladder shaped areas of the left renal parenchyma that remained low density after the injection of contrast medium and the fill defect on distal branch of left renal artery (Figure 1A). Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin was started and selective renal artery angiography was performed soon after abdominal CT to identify renal artery lesions and rule out further arterial occlusion lesions (Figure 2). Intraarterial thrombolytic therapy with continuous injection of urokinase 1000 U/min was given, the total dosage was 400 000 units and the symptoms were alleviated remarkably. The next day, intraarterial continuous injection of urokinase was given again with a total dosage of 200 000 units. The low density areas diminished in the follow-up angiography and the intraarterial catheter was removed. Anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin followed by warfarin to keep INR 2.0-3.0 and antiplatelet treatment with low dose aspirin was given. No thrombus was detected by Doppler ultrasound scan. The results of coagulation function were normal. The levels of anticardiolipins (ACL), Ig+C3, anti-streptolysin“o” (ASO), rheumatoid factor (RF), C-reactive protein (CRP) were negative. Enhanced CT revealed that the thrombus of left renal artery reduced at 2 weeks after the thrombolytic therapy (Figure 1B). Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin was given after discharge; and there were no recurrence during the six-month follow-up.Figure 1A.: CT image of the left renal infarction. Multiple ladder-shaped areas of the left renal parenchyma that remained hypodense after the injection of contrast medium and showed no enhancement and the fill defect on distal branch of left renal artery (arrow).Figure 1B. Follow-up CT, post-thrombolytic therapy. The thrombus of left renal artery were lessened (arrow).Figure 2. Angiography of the renal artery shows the occlusion of the left artery distal branch (arrows).DISCUSSION Acute renal infarction is often an overlooked or delayed diagnosis.1 Because its presentation is non-specific, it is frequently mistaken for the more commonly encountered ureterolithiasis, pyelonephritis, appendicitis, diverticulitis, biliary obstruction and torsion of pelvic masses. The incidence of renal infarction in an autopsy study was 1.4%, whereas clinical diagnosis was made in only 0.014% of the studied patients.2 Spontaneous kidney infarction was documented in 55 of 18 287 patients and was associated with renal artery disease in 41 cases.3 Atrial fibrillation,4 previous embolic events and valvular or ischaemic heart disease are the major causes of acute renal infarction. Additionally, other causes of acute renal infarction include trauma,5 hereditary or acquired clotting disorders, both intravenous and nasal cocaine abuse, vessel anomalies (such as spontaneous renal artery dissection,6 fibromuscular dysplasia or hereditary diseases such as Marfan syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome), medical interventions such as surgery for valve replacements, kidney transplantation, endovascular catheterization and application of intraluminal stents and malignant disease. Bolderman et al7 studied twenty-seven patients with nontraumatic CT documented acute renal infarction and grouped them according to the presence or absence of cardiac disease, either obvious at presentation or detected during clinical examination. They found that sixteen patients (59%) had no discernible structural or arrhythmic cardiac disease and were classified as idiopathic group; patients in idiopathic group were younger and besides smoking, had fewer common cardiovascular risk factors. Renal artery thrombosis often occurs in left renal artery. Its causes include trauma, atherosclerosis accompanied thrombosis, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, connective tissue disease, thromboembolism occlusive vasculitis, severe inflammatory response syndrome, and idiopathic renal artery thrombosis. The common clinical presentations of acute renal infarction include lumbar pain on the side of the renal infarction, hypertension, and renal dysfunction. Patients with acute renal infarction commonly present with abrupt persistent flank pain, abdominal pain or low back pain, accompanied by fever, headache, nausea and vomiting. However, these symptoms are nonspecific. Physical examination reveals costovertebral angle tenderness, which is a characteristic sign of acute renal infarction. However, patients with thrombosis that affects smaller vessels may be asymptomatic. Kidney infarction induces acute hypertension, which in many instances is of a temporary nature: some patients present hypertension alone without any symptoms referable to renal infarction.8 The prevalence of spontaneous kidney infarction in patients referred for hypertension is 3‰ and the incidence is 0.18‰ per year.3 A rapid deterioration in renal function with anuria or oliguria usually develops in patients with bilateral renal artery thrombosis or infarction in a solitary kidney. Patients with unilateral artery thrombosis accompanied by contralateral artery spasm may present renal insufficiency too. Serum creatine level may increase in patients with renal distal branch thrombosis. All the laboratory tests are either nonspecific (LDH, haematuria, CRP, WBC) or lacking in sensitivity (creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase)9 —acute renal infarction is often a diagnosis made by exclusion. The common laboratory findings include the following. (1) Leukocytosis. (2) Haematuria (gross or microscopic) and proteinuria: urinalysis by dipstick is a simple screening test for many renal diseases. The sensitivity of this test to detect haematuria is high in contrast to a low specificity because of cross-reaction in the presence of myoglobinuria. Domanovits et al10 reported that haematuria was present at admission in 74% of their patients and in another 11%, the test became positive within the next 24 hours. Consequently, serial urinalysis within the first 24 hours of pain onset should be performed to increase its diagnostic value. However, the presence of haematuria can not differentiate renal calculus from acute renal infarction. (3) Serum AST and LDH level increased, especially an increase in LDH level is highly sensitive. Hazanov et al11 identified 44 cases of renal embolus, 41 (93%) patients had an increased serum LDH level. Although elevated serum LDH level is nonspecific for tissue necrosis, such increases would not be expected in patients with calculus disease. We suggest that serum LDH level may still be evaluated where there is persistent flank pain with or without haematuria or lack of evidence of urolithiasis. (4) Renal scintigraphy, ultrasonography and enhanced CT may be useful in diagnosing acute renal infarction. Although ultrasonography still has its role in excluding obstructive uropathy, it lacks sensitivity to detect early renal infarction. Contrast enhanced CT is the noninvasive standard for imaging acute renal infarction and is potentially available 24 hours/day. Selective renal artery angiography is an invasive diagnostic method that is not without morbidity. Thus, a high degree of clinical suspicion remains the key for early diagnosis of renal infarction. In patients who present with the triad of high risk for a thromboembolic event; persistent low back, flank and abdominal pain, elevated serum LDH and/or haematuria; contrast enhanced CT should be performed as soon as possible to rule out or to prove acute renal infarction. Therapeutic guidelines for renal artery thrombosis have not been established. The limit of warm ischaemic time for the kidney is 60 minutes to 90 minutes. Prompt recognition of acute renal infarction is important since thrombolysis, anticoagulation, or embolectomy may minimize the loss of renal function. Previous studies have shown that anticoagulation is as effective as surgical therapy: conservative therapy is recommended except in the case that bilateral emboli or infarctions of a solitary kidney have occurred.12 Thrombectomy may be appropriate in the case that bilateral emboli or infarctions of a solitary kidney have occurred. The recommended therapy has changed drastically during the past 30 years. Selective intraarterial thrombolytic therapy is considered as an effective treatment for unilateral renal infarction,13 even for bilateral renal infarction.14 If nephronecrosis develops, a nephrectomy should be performed. Therapy in acute renal infarction typically consisted of low molecular weight heparins in the acute phase followed by warfarin and low dose aspirin. However, the duration of therapy and the added value of anticoagulants over antiplatelets in the setting of idiopathic renal infarction are unknown. In addition, because these patients are also at high risk for further thromboembolisms to other organs, this might be prevented by long-term anticoagulation. Although nonspecific, the common symptom of flank pain may be the first indication of a serious illness such as acute renal infarction. Acute renal infarction may occur in previously apparently healthy individuals. In patients with flank pain without lithiasis, the diagnosis of acute renal infarction should be suspected and enhanced CT should be considered, especially when serum lactate dehydrogenase is elevated, even in the absence of atrial fibrillation.