International trade and the environment

G Grossman, AB Krueger

1995-01-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China’s Exports

Wei Zhang,Feng Wang,Klaus Hubacek,Yu Liu,Jinnan Wang,Kuishuang Feng,Ling Jiang,Hongqiang Jiang,Bing Zhang,Jun Bi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05651

IF: 11.4

2018-01-01

Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract:As the world's factory, China has enjoyed huge economic benefits from international export but also suffered severe environmental consequences. Most studies investigating unequal environmental exchange associated with trade took China as a homogeneous entity ignoring considerable inequality and outsourcing of pollution within China. This paper traces the regional mismatch of export-induced economic benefits and environmental costs along national supply chains by using the latest multiregional input-output model and emission inventory for 2012. The results indicate that approximately 56% of the national GDP induced by exports has been received by developed coastal regions, while about 72% of air pollution embodied in national exports, measured as aggregated atmospheric pollutant equivalents (APE), has been mainly incurred by less developed central and western regions. For each yuan of export-induced GDP, developed regions only incurred 0.4-0.6 g APE emissions, whereas less developed regions from western or central China had to suffer 4-8 times the amount of emissions. This is due to poorer regions providing lower value added and higher emission-intensive inputs and having lower environmental standards and less efficient technologies. Our results may pave a way to mitigate the unequal relationship between developed and less developed regions from the perspective of environment-economy nexus.
Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?

Gabriel Felbermayr,Sonja Peterson,Joschka Wanner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12628

2024-06-21

Journal of Economic Surveys

Abstract:While international trade can offer gains from specialization and access to a wider range of products, it is also closely interlinked with global environmental problems, above all, anthropogenic climate change. This survey provides a structured overview of the economic literature on the interaction between environmental outcomes, trade, environmental policy and trade policy. In this endeavor, it covers approaches reaching from descriptive data analysis based on input‐output tables, over quantitative trade models and econometric studies to game‐theoretic analyses. Addressed issues are in particular the emission content of trade and emissions along value chains, the relocation of dirty firms and environmental impacts abroad, impacts of specific trade policies (such as trade agreements or tariffs) or environmental policies (such as border carbon adjustment), transportation emissions, as well as the role of firms. Across the different topics covered, the paper also tries to identify avenues for future research, with a particular focus on extending quantitative trade and environment models.

economics
Agricultural Trade and Environmental Sustainability

Kathy Baylis,Thomas Heckelei,Thomas W. Hertel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453

IF: 6.6171

2021-10-05

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Abstract:Global agriculture consumes substantial resources and produces significant pollution. By shifting its production to new locations, and inducing changes in technology and input use, trade has a substantial impact on environmental sustainability of the world's food systems, but due to suboptimal environmental policy, the exact nature of these impacts is in dispute. We review the literature on agricultural trade and environmental sustainability, highlighting the different approaches taken in ecology versus economics. While useful in identifying environmental costs, much of the ecological literature does not compare these costs to a trade-free counterfactual and can therefore be misleading. Further, by moving production to places with more resources and increasing production efficiency, trade can reduce the environmental impact of food production. On the other hand, trade can also limit the effectiveness of domestic environmental policy because production can be shifted to countries with less stringent regulations. However, recently, consumers are leveraging trade policy to induce exporters to improve environmental sustainability. While such policies are gaining traction in wealthy countries, evidence suggests that such measures will not reach their potential without buy-in from decision makers in the countries where the environmental damages are occurring.

economics,environmental studies,agricultural economics & policy
Trade and environment : theory and policy in the context of EU enlargement and economic transition

J. Maxwell,Rafael Reuveny

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845426804

Abstract:Part I: The Trade - Environment Debate in Context: The US Decision on Kyoto Part II: Trade and Environment Policies Part III: Environmental Policy Concerns in the Context of EU Enlargement Part IV: Economic and Environmental Policies in Transition Economies Index.

Political Science,Environmental Science,Economics
The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: conflict or cooperation?

Nguyen Van Tran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08352-9

IF: 5.8

2020-03-28

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:Identifying environmental consequences of international trade has a crucial role in constructing and planning strategies of any country, especially in developing countries that are currently witnessing a significant increase in trade openness; however, little efforts are made to investigate the environmental consequences of trade openness. The paper attempts to investigate the dynamic relationship between trade openness and environmental pollutants incorporating potential factors affecting environmental quality in 66 developing economies over the period 1971–2017. This article employs the powerful approach two-step generalized method of moment's estimators with a finite sample correction to obtain more accurate inference. The key empirical results are as follows: (1) trade openness may be harmful for the environment while confirming the existence of an environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. (2) An increase in pollutants, namely carbon dioxide emissions, ambient particulate matter and nitrous oxide emissions in the previous period, is associated with a rise in pollutants in the future suggesting that if no action in reducing pollutants is taken, environmental quality is worse. (3) Energy consumption, financial development and industrialization have a significant contribution to deteriorating environment. The implications of these results also are discussed and proposed for developing economies in this research.

environmental sciences
Environmental regulations and international trade: A quantitative economic analysis of world pollution emissions

Yuwan Duan,Ting Ji,Yi Lu,Siying Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104521

IF: 8.262

2021-11-01

Journal of Public Economics

Abstract:We develop and quantitatively evaluate a general equilibrium trade model with pollution as a byproduct of production to study the interactions between international trade, the environment, and environmental regulations. Our analysis suggests that environmental regulations provide a source of comparative advantage, but we fail to find evidence that reducing trade barriers causes pollution-intensive industries to concentrate in countries with weak environmental regulation stringency. The reason is that as a crucial determinant of pollution emissions and abatement, environmental regulations are weak in determining international specializations. By comparing environmental regulation stringency with other determinants of international trade, we identify productivity and trade costs as being the major forces that suppress the influence of environmental regulations on deciding international production and trade. Furthermore, we incorporate endogenous environmental policy into our framework and explore how environmental policy responds to trade liberalization. We allow for strategic environmental policy, but find its use as a substitute for tariffs to be quite limited. We also evaluate various forces that determine the overall impacts of international trade on worldwide pollution emissions.

economics
Analysis of Environmental Barriers in International Trade

Gekun Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/essaeme-17.2017.298

2017-01-01

Abstract:With the development of the world economy, the continuous improvement of the level of productivity, human beings continue to meet their own material needs, but also brought about serious environmental problems. For the common interests of mankind and the sustainable development of society and economy, the world began to seek cooperation in the international...
International Trade: Theory and Policy

P. Krugman,Marc J. Melitz,M. Obstfeld

2014-01-23

Abstract:1. Introduction 2. World Trade: An Overview 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model 4. Specific Factors and Income Distribution 5. Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model 6. The Standard Trade Model 7. External Economies of Scale and the International Location of Production 8. Firms in the Global Economy: Export Decisions, Outsourcing, and Multinational Enterprises 9. The Instruments of Trade Policy 10. The Political Economy of Trade Policy 11. Trade Policy in Developing Countries 12. Controversies in Trade Policy

Political Science,Economics
Trade and Water Pollution: Evidence from China

Wenhao Yang,Yuanzhe Huang,Jinsong Ye,Changbiao Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093600

IF: 3.9

2024-04-26

Sustainability

Abstract:China's economy has achieved significant success by integrating itself into the globalized production system over an extended period. However, it is crucial to address the environmental consequences that accompany rapid economic progress. The correlation between trade and environmental pollution is still controversial in the existing literature, with a lack of research specifically investigating this relationship using detailed data at the firm level. Based on the quasi-natural experiment of China's accession to the WTO, this study uses the DID method to evaluate the causal relationship between trade and the environment experimentally. It is found that trade liberalization significantly increases firms' industrial wastewater emissions, and the empirical results remain robust after parallel trend tests, placebo tests, and replacement variables. The mechanism of action suggests that trade expansion enhances corporate pollution emissions through two channels: attracting foreign investment into the country and intensifying energy consumption. A heterogeneity analysis reveals that the pollution-enhancing effect of trade expansion on enterprises is mainly concentrated in export-oriented enterprises, labor-intensive industries, and coastal regions. Additionally, further analysis shows that trade liberalization not only has local impacts but also spatial spillover effects on enterprise pollution. It is found that enhancing environmental governance and reducing corruption can effectively mitigate the adverse environmental consequences caused by trade liberalization.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Globalization and Environment: Effects of International Trade on Emission Intensity Reduction of Pollutants Causing Global and Local Concerns

Ting Ma,Yue Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113249

IF: 8.7

2021-01-01

Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract:International trade's impact on the pollution reduction, especially varied reduction effects dealing with global or local pollutants has not been thoroughly researched empirically. We explored effects of international trade participation on both the carbon dioxide emission intensity and sulfur dioxide emission intensity with a panel data of 179 major countries during 20 years when globalization thrived. Carbon dioxide causing climate change is a global concern. While sulfur dioxide is one major air pollutant causing local health problems. Empirically, international trade participation mainly reduces carbon dioxide emission intensity but not sulfur dioxide emission intensity. Also, trade in goods form is more effective than in service form. However, international trade participation does little to improving a country's overall technology level, implying that regulation enhancement under international norm is the main mechanism. Compared with developed countries, developing countries can reduce both kinds of pollutant emission intensities more effectively by participating into international trade. A case study of China's entering into World Trade Organization (WTO)'s impact on pollutant reduction can provide more evidence. Also, developing countries with higher industrialization level experiences a bigger improvement in cleaner production. And developing countries with higher democratization level pay more attention to reduce local environmental concerns.
Trade policy and environmental quality in Africa: Aggregation issues and policy deductions

Yang Shu,Joshua Sunday Riti,Kexin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141217

IF: 11.1

2024-02-17

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:The significance of the impact of trade on sustainable development cannot be overstated. Even though there is a large amount of literature examining the trade - environment connection, most of the studies that have been done so have primarily examined variables like trade openness and foreign direct investment, ignoring the impact of particular trade policy tools, like tariffs. Moreover, there is a pertinent concern about aggregation bias in aggregate estimations, which could lead to inaccurate assessments of the overall connections and potentially misguide policymakers. In contrast to the prevailing trend, this study delves into the influence of trade policy, specifically tariffs, on the environmental degradation in 20 African nations. The investigation also addresses the issue of aggregation bias, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the trade policy-environment link. The panel long-run estimates, employing the PMG estimator, reveal a significantly negative influence of tariffs on ecological footprints. This suggests that, in this context, tariffs do not create market inefficiency but rather contribute to strengthening environmental quality in the African sub-region. The findings underscore the importance of considering specific trade policy instruments in environmental policymaking. Policymakers in the region are presented with an opportunity to strategically utilize tariffs as a tool to address environmental degradation issues. The study further highlights that the relationship is negative at the panel level but positive at some of the individual country-level, indicating the presence of aggregation bias in estimating the trade policy-environmental dilapidation association on a panel scale. As aggregation bias may lead to misguided environmental policies, policymakers are prevailed on to carefully consider both panel and individual country-particular level when formulating trade and environmental strategies.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
The dynamic impact of trade on environment

Huanhuan Wang,Zhenglian Zhang,Zhiqiang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12624

2024-04-13

Journal of Economic Surveys

Abstract:Utilizing long‐term and high‐resolution pollution remote sensing data, this study examines the dynamic impact of export expansion on the local environment in China from 2000 to 2020. Regions facing larger export expansion experience more pronounced initial deterioration in local air quality, while followed by a more prominent subsequent environmental improvement, indicating that the environmental impact of trade varies over time. Further analysis reveals that a key driver behind this dynamic change is the adjustment in environmental policies, particularly when local government faces higher pressure in achieving the environmental goals and when the central government takes over environmental monitoring powers. Additionally, under more stringent environmental regulations, regional export growth leads to increased environmental expenditures, concurrently driving localities to reduce heavily polluting engergy inputs such as coal. Our study suggests that environmental policies can facilitate the synergistic development of trade and the environment.

economics
To See or Forsee: Environment Regulation or Economic Interest

Hashneet Kaur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69974/glslawjournal.v6i2.137

2024-07-01

Abstract:We are living in an Anthropocene era where there is a rising conflict between nature and humankind. With the advent of globalization, the world has become one trading platform where manufacturing deployment trade-off is adopted at the expense of the environment with an objective of profit maximization. However, this conflict can be traced back to the 18th century popularly known as the industrial era. In the Initial stage (1900-1950), there were not many conventions or declarations dealing with environment protection, except for few, one such is a treaty signed between US and Great Britain in 1911 to curb ecological crisis in North Pacific Fur Seal population. Later at the formative stage (1951-1972) many authors highlighted the plight of environment in their books like “Silent Spring”. Further, the Stockholm Declaration of 1972 introduced the right to healthy environment, precautionary principle, and principle of no harm. This revolutionary step drew the attention of the world leaders towards the development of environmental jurisprudence resulting in futuristic developments like Kyoto Protocol, Rio+20 and Paris Agreement with the aim to mitigate and adapt to the changing climate. However, there is no specific convention or declaration dealing with the international trade and environment law, which draws our attention to identify the foremost issue of how trade and environment are corelated, what are the key mechanisms dealing with the said conflict and lastly how sustainable entrepreneurship can be one of the contributory factors to resolve the issue of climate change with the help of trade.
International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States

Kevin P Gallagher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.012

Abstract:Although there is a burgeoning literature on the effects of international trade on the environment, relatively little work has been done on where trade most directly effects the environment: the transportation sector. This article shows how international trade is affecting air pollution emissions in the United States' shipping sector. Recent work has shown that cargo ships have been long overlooked regarding their contribution to air pollution. Indeed, ship emissions have recently been deemed "the last unregulated source of traditional air pollutants". Air pollution from ships has a number of significant local, national, and global environmental effects. Building on past studies, we examine the economic costs of this increasing and unregulated form of environmental damage. We find that total emissions from ships are largely increasing due to the increase in foreign commerce (or international trade). The economic costs of SO2 pollution range from dollars 697 million to dollars 3.9 billion during the period examined, or dollars 77 to dollars 435 million on an annual basis. The bulk of the cost is from foreign commerce, where the annual costs average to dollars 42 to dollars 241 million. For NOx emissions the costs are dollars 3.7 billion over the entire period or dollars 412 million per year. Because foreign trade is driving the growth in US shipping, we also estimate the effect of the Uruguay Round on emissions. Separating out the effects of global trade agreements reveals that the trade agreement-led emissions amounted to dollars 96 to dollars 542 million for SO2 between 1993 and 2001, or dollars 10 to dollars 60 million per year. For NOx they were dollars 745 million for the whole period or dollars 82 million per year. Without adequate policy responses, we predict that these trends and costs will continue into the future.
The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*

Joseph S Shapiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa042

IF: 19.013

2020-12-16

The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract:Abstract This article describes a new fact, then analyzes its causes and consequences: in most countries, import tariffs and nontariff barriers are substantially lower on dirty than on clean industries, where an industry’s “dirtiness” is defined as its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per dollar of output. This difference in trade policy creates a global implicit subsidy to CO2 emissions in internationally traded goods and contributes to climate change. This global implicit subsidy to CO2 emissions totals several hundred billion dollars annually. The greater protection of downstream industries, which are relatively clean, substantially accounts for this pattern. The downstream pattern can be explained by theories where industries lobby for low tariffs on their inputs but final consumers are poorly organized. A quantitative general equilibrium model suggests that if countries applied similar trade policies to clean and dirty goods, global CO2 emissions would decrease and global real income would change little.

economics
The Climate Crisis and Export Intensity: A Comparative International Study of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Global South, 1990–2014

Steven Andrew Mejia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2020.1845011

2020-11-17

International Journal of Sociology

Abstract:<span>The climate crisis is among the gravest threats to humanity and the planet. Combatting the climate crisis requires understanding of the sociostructural causes of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Social scientists have long debated the environmental implications of trade openness for developing countries, with world-systems analysis/dependency theory suggesting that trade openness is associated with increased environmental degradation. Conversely, neoliberal thought argues that trade openness is associated with decreased environmental harm. I use fixed effects panel regression models with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors to estimate the effect of trade openness on carbon dioxide emissions, methane emissions, and nitrous oxide emissions. I find that trade openness positively affects carbon dioxide emissions, methane emissions, and nitrous oxide emissions, which supports world-systems analysis/dependency theory expectations. This analysis underscores the need to consider the extent to which international trade contributes to the emission of greenhouse gases.</span>
Reinvestigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) of carbon emissions and ecological footprint in 147 countries: a matter of trade protectionism

Qiang Wang,Xiaowei Wang,Rongrong Li,Xueting Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02639-9

2024-01-24

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Abstract:Abstract Environmental degradation has profoundly impacted both human society and ecosystems. The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) illuminates the intricate relationship between economic growth and environmental decline. However, the recent surge in trade protectionism has heightened global economic uncertainties, posing a severe threat to global environmental sustainability. This research aims to investigate the intricate pathways through which trade protection, assessed by available trade openness data, influences the nexus between economic growth and environmental degradation. Leveraging comprehensive global panel data spanning 147 countries from 1995 to 2018, this study meticulously examines the non-linear dynamics among trade, economy, and the environment, with a particular emphasis on validating the EKC hypothesis. This study encompasses exhaustive global and panel data regressions categorized across four income groups. The research substantiates the validity of the EKC hypothesis within the confines of this investigation. As income levels rise, the impact of economic growth on environmental degradation initially intensifies before displaying a diminishing trend. Additionally, trade protection manifests as a detriment to improving global environmental quality. The ramifications of trade protectionism display nuanced variations across income strata. In high-income nations, trade protection appears to contribute to mitigating environmental degradation. Conversely, within other income brackets, the stimulating effect of trade protection on environmental pressure is more conspicuous. In other words, trade protectionism exacerbates environmental degradation, particularly affecting lower-income countries, aligning with the concept of pollution havens. The study’s results illuminate nuanced thresholds in the relationship between trade, economic growth, and environmental degradation across income groups, emphasizing the heterogeneous impact and underlying mechanisms. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, urging collaborative efforts among nations to achieve a harmonious balance between economic advancement and environmental preservation on a global scale.
Trade of environmental versus non-environmental goods and carbon emissions in high and middle–income countries

Shahzad Alvi,Imtiaz Ahmad,Abid Rehman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26972-9

IF: 5.8

2023-04-21

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:The environmental goods and services industry consists of the activities that generate products and services to monitor, avoid, restrict, reduce, or repair environmental risk and decrease non-renewable energy resource usage. Although the environmental goods industry does not exist in many countries, mainly developing countries, through international trade, its impacts are reaching developing countries. This study examines the impact of environmental and non-environmental goods trade on emissions in high and middle–income countries. For empirical estimation, the panel ARDL model is applied using the data from 2007 to 2020. The results indicate that importing environmental goods decreases emissions while imports of non-environmental goods increase the emissions in high-income countries in the long run. It is found that imports of environmental goods in developing countries decrease emissions in both the short and long run. However, in the short run, the imports of non-environmental goods in developing countries have an insignificant impact on emissions.

environmental sciences
Environmental R&D and trade-adjusted carbon emissions: evaluating the role of international trade

Shu Jiang,Muhammad Zubair Chishti,Husam Rjoub,Syed Rahim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20003-9

IF: 5.8

2022-04-22

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:In the contemporary era, it is evident that consumption-based carbon emissions (CCO2e), adjusted for international trade, are a more accurate and robust measure of environmental pollution than production-based emissions. Therefore, many studies have focused on exploring the determinants of CCO2e; however, the literature could not yet discern environment-related R&D budget (ERRD) and political risk index (PRI) as a new driver. To fill this gap, the current paper aims to divulge the dynamic effects of ERRD and PRI on CCO2e while taking imports, exports, and GDP as control regressors. To do so, the G7 nations' data from 1990 to 2020 is utilized, and several advanced econometric tests and techniques are deployed to tackle the advanced issues (i.e., cross-section dependence, heterogeneity, and endogeneity) in econometrics. The CS-ARDL estimates suggest that PRI and ERRD significantly lessen the environmental quality by disrupting the detrimental effects of CCO2e. Likewise, the rise in exports possesses a negative association with the ratio of CCO2e. However, CCO2e significantly tends to surge on account of an increase in GDP and imports. GDP squared exhibits the negative link with CCO2e, confirming the EKC hypothesis in G7 nations. Besides, the AMG technique and causality test validate the robustness of our findings. In addition, the policies related to CCO2e by authorities will take approximately more than a year to absorb their effects.

environmental sciences
The impacts of international trade on global greenhouse gas emissions: A thought experiment based on a novel no-trade analysis

Zhaodan Wu,Lan Yang,Qiyong Chen,Quanliang Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113836

2021-12-15

Abstract:Trade has been substantially influencing regional economic development, environmental sustainability, and human well-being. Enabled by the decomposition analysis, pollution haven hypothesis or "no-trade" scenarios (NTSs), the effects of trade on global/national social-economic-environmental development have been revealed. However, major limitations (e.g., using with-trade economic structures or neglecting price differences) existed in previous studies, and thus made the previous assessments of trade's effects unsatisfactorily. This study develops a novel NTS that addresses the existing limitations, and further applies it to estimate the effect of trade on global economic development and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We show that current international trade benefits the global economic growth but with a consequence of more GHG emissions compared with the NTS. The hypothetical production in small countries (e.g., Luxembourg or Japan) would be more constrained by the production factors (e.g., land) under the NTS, compared with those factor-endowment countries (e.g., the United States or India). For country-specific analysis, we find that today's developed countries would have a substantial increase in their GHG emissions of clothing- and service-related products under the NTS, whereas countries with net-export (e.g., China or Brazil) would have less GHG emissions under the NTS. Enhancing future global collaborations is vital, especially for small or resource-deficient economies, if they are to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

International trade and the environment

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China’s Exports

Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?

Agricultural Trade and Environmental Sustainability

Trade and environment : theory and policy in the context of EU enlargement and economic transition

The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: conflict or cooperation?

Environmental regulations and international trade: A quantitative economic analysis of world pollution emissions

Analysis of Environmental Barriers in International Trade

International Trade: Theory and Policy

Trade and Water Pollution: Evidence from China

Globalization and Environment: Effects of International Trade on Emission Intensity Reduction of Pollutants Causing Global and Local Concerns

Trade policy and environmental quality in Africa: Aggregation issues and policy deductions

The dynamic impact of trade on environment

To See or Forsee: Environment Regulation or Economic Interest

International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States

The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*

The Climate Crisis and Export Intensity: A Comparative International Study of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Global South, 1990–2014

Reinvestigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) of carbon emissions and ecological footprint in 147 countries: a matter of trade protectionism

Trade of environmental versus non-environmental goods and carbon emissions in high and middle–income countries

Environmental R&D and trade-adjusted carbon emissions: evaluating the role of international trade

The impacts of international trade on global greenhouse gas emissions: A thought experiment based on a novel no-trade analysis