Trade and Water Pollution: Evidence from China

Wenhao Yang,Yuanzhe Huang,Jinsong Ye,Changbiao Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093600

IF: 3.9

2024-04-26

Sustainability

Abstract:China's economy has achieved significant success by integrating itself into the globalized production system over an extended period. However, it is crucial to address the environmental consequences that accompany rapid economic progress. The correlation between trade and environmental pollution is still controversial in the existing literature, with a lack of research specifically investigating this relationship using detailed data at the firm level. Based on the quasi-natural experiment of China's accession to the WTO, this study uses the DID method to evaluate the causal relationship between trade and the environment experimentally. It is found that trade liberalization significantly increases firms' industrial wastewater emissions, and the empirical results remain robust after parallel trend tests, placebo tests, and replacement variables. The mechanism of action suggests that trade expansion enhances corporate pollution emissions through two channels: attracting foreign investment into the country and intensifying energy consumption. A heterogeneity analysis reveals that the pollution-enhancing effect of trade expansion on enterprises is mainly concentrated in export-oriented enterprises, labor-intensive industries, and coastal regions. Additionally, further analysis shows that trade liberalization not only has local impacts but also spatial spillover effects on enterprise pollution. It is found that enhancing environmental governance and reducing corruption can effectively mitigate the adverse environmental consequences caused by trade liberalization.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the impact of trade liberalization on environmental pollution of Chinese enterprises, especially the situation of industrial wastewater discharge. Specifically, based on China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a quasi - natural experiment, the study uses the Difference - in - Differences (DID) method to evaluate the causal relationship between trade liberalization and enterprise pollution emissions. The main questions of the paper can be summarized as follows:

1. **Does trade liberalization increase the industrial wastewater emissions of enterprises?**
- The study finds that trade liberalization significantly increases the industrial wastewater emissions of enterprises. After conducting parallel trend tests, placebo tests and variable substitution, the empirical results are still robust.

2. **Through which mechanisms does trade liberalization affect enterprise pollution emissions?**
- Mechanism analysis shows that trade expansion mainly increases enterprise pollution emissions through two channels: attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) into China and intensifying energy consumption.

3. **Is there heterogeneity in the pollution effects of trade liberalization?**
- Heterogeneity analysis shows that the pollution effects of trade expansion are more obvious for export - oriented enterprises, labor - intensive industries and enterprises in coastal areas.

4. **Does trade liberalization have a spatial spillover effect?**
- Further analysis shows that trade liberalization not only has a direct impact on local enterprises, but also affects the pollution emissions in neighboring areas through the spatial spillover effect, forming a pollution transfer gradient.

5. **How to mitigate the negative environmental impacts brought by trade liberalization?**
- The study points out that strengthening environmental governance and reducing corruption can effectively alleviate the adverse environmental consequences brought by trade liberalization.

### Key Formulas

1. **DID Model**:
\[
\ln(\text{pollution}_{ijt})=\alpha_0 + \alpha_1(\text{NTR}_j\times\text{Post}_t)+\alpha_3\text{X}_{ijt}+\eta_j+\gamma_s+\lambda_{ct}+\xi_{it}
\]
where:
- \(\ln(\text{pollution}_{ijt})\) represents the pollution emission level of enterprises in industry \(j\) and at time \(t\).
- \(\text{NTR}_j\) represents the degree of trade liberalization in industry \(j\).
- \(\text{Post}_t\) is a time dummy variable, which takes the value of 1 after China's accession to the WTO and 0 before.
- \(\text{X}_{ijt}\) represents control variables at the enterprise and industry levels.
- \(\eta_j\) represents industry - fixed effects.
- \(\gamma_s\) represents city - fixed effects.
- \(\lambda_{ct}\) represents the joint fixed effects of province and time.
- \(\xi_{it}\) represents the model residual.

2. **Measurement of the Degree of Trade Liberalization**:
\[
\text{NTR}_j = \text{Non NTR Rate}_j-\text{NTR Rate}_j
\]
where:
- \(\text{Non NTR Rate}_j\) represents the second - type of punitive tariffs set by the United States against non - market economies (such as North Korea and Cuba).
- \(\text{NTR Rate}_j\) represents the tariffs enjoyed by normal trade partnership (China enjoys this tariff treatment after joining the WTO).

### Main Conclusions

- Trade liberalization significantly increases the industrial wastewater emissions of enterprises.
- Trade expansion increases enterprise pollution emissions through two channels: attracting foreign direct investment and intensifying energy consumption.
- The pollution effects of trade expansion are more obvious for export - oriented enterprises, labor - intensive industries and enterprises in coastal areas.
- Trade liberalization not only has a direct impact on local enterprises, but also affects the pollution emissions in neighboring areas through the spatial spillover effect.
- Strengthening environmental governance and reducing corruption can effectively alleviate the adverse environmental consequences brought by trade liberalization.