Abstract:We derive the general counting rules for a quantum effective field theory (EFT) in d\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathsf {d}$$\end{document} dimensions. The rules are valid for strongly and weakly coupled theories, and they predict that all kinetic energy terms are canonically normalized. They determine the energy dependence of scattering cross sections in the range of validity of the EFT expansion. We show that the size of the cross sections is controlled by the Λ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Lambda $$\end{document} power counting of EFT, not by chiral counting, even for chiral perturbation theory (χ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\chi $$\end{document}PT). The relation between Λ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Lambda $$\end{document} and f is generalized to d\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathsf {d}$$\end{document} dimensions. We show that the naive dimensional analysis 4π\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$4\pi $$\end{document} counting is related to ħ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\hbar $$\end{document} counting. The EFT counting rules are applied to χ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\chi $$\end{document}PT, low-energy weak interactions, Standard Model EFT and the non-trivial case of Higgs EFT.

Analysis of general power counting rules in effective field theory

Effective Field Theory Power Counting at Finite Density

EFT, decoupling, Higgs boson mixing, and higher dimensional operators

Power Counting and Wilsonian Renormalization in Nuclear Effective Field Theory

A periodic table of effective field theories

Power counting of the pion-dilaton effective field theory

Bayesian Analysis of $χ$EFT at Leading Order in a Modified Weinberg Power Counting Approach

Loop counting matters in SMEFT

Low-energy theorems for neutron-proton scattering in $χ$EFT using a perturbative power counting

Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

Low-Energy Theorems for Neutron–Proton Scattering in EFT Using a Perturbative Power Counting

Positivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories

Power counting for nuclear forces in chiral effective field theory

Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching

Effective field theory bootstrap, large-N χPT and holographic QCD

Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Anomalous Dimensions

Addressing energy density functionals in the language of path-integrals I: Comparative study of diagrammatic techniques applied to the (0+0)-D $O(N)$-symmetric $φ^{4}$-theory

BSM Benchmarks for Effective Field Theories in Higgs and Electroweak Physics

Power corrections to energy flow correlations from large spin perturbation

On the validity of the effective field theory approach to SM precision tests