Abstract:Study objective: Hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma(s) is associated with significant morbidity including blood loss. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify nonhormonal interventions, perioperative surgical interventions, and devices to minimize blood loss at the time of hysterectomy for leiomyoma. Data sources: Librarian-led search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases from 1946 to 2018 with hand-guided updates. Methods of study selection: Included studies reported on keywords of hysterectomy, leiomyoma, and operative blood loss/postoperative hemorrhage/uterine bleeding/metrorrhagia/hematoma. The review excluded a comparison of route of hysterectomy, morcellation, vaginal cuff closure, hormonal medications, vessel sealing devices for vaginal hysterectomy, and case series with <10 patients. Tabulation, integration, and results: Surgical blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) drop, hemorrhage, transfusion, and major and minor complications were analyzed and aggregated in meta-analyses for comparable studies in each category. A total of 2016 unique studies were identified, 33 of which met the inclusion criteria, and 22 were used for quantitative synthesis. The perioperative use of misoprostol in abdominal hysterectomy (AH) was associated with a lower postoperative Hb drop (0.59 g/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.79; p < .01) and blood loss (-96.43 mL; 95% CI, -153.52 to -39.34; p < .01) compared with placebo. Securing the uterine vessels at their origin in laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) was associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss (-69.07 mL; 95% CI, -135.20 to -2.95; p = .04) but no significant change in postoperative Hb (0.24 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.78; p = .39) compared with securing them by the uterine isthmus. Uterine artery ligation in LH before dissecting the ovarian/utero-ovarian vessels was associated with lower surgical blood loss compared with standard ligation (-27.72 mL; 95% CI, -35.07 to -20.38; p < .01). The postoperative Hb drop was not significantly different with a bipolar electrosurgical device versus suturing in AH (0.26 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.71; p = .26). There was no significant difference between an electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) and conventional bipolar electrosurgical devices in the Hb drop (0.02 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.20; p = .79) or blood loss (-50.88 mL; 95% CI, -106.44 to 4.68; p = .07) in LH. Blood loss in LH was not decreased with the LigaSure (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) impedance monitoring EBVS compared with competing EBVS systems monitoring impedance or temperature (2.00 mL; 95% CI, -8.09 to 12.09; p = .70). No significant differences in hemorrhage, transfusion, or major complications were noted for all interventions. Conclusion: Perioperative misoprostol in AH led to a reduction in surgical blood loss and postoperative Hb drop (moderate level of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines) although the clinical benefit is likely limited. Remaining interventions, although promising, had at best low-quality evidence to support their use at this time. Larger and rigorously designed randomized trials are needed to establish the optimal set of perioperative interventions for use in hysterectomy for leiomyomas.

Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for vaginal hysterectomies

Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial

Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: Comparison of conventional suture ligature versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for radical abdominal hysterectomy

Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial

[Postoperative pain after hysterectomy through vaginal routes using electro surgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional suture ligature]

Comparative Analysis of Electrosurgical Energy and Hemostatic Sealant for Hemostasis in Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Phase III Study

Minimally invasive vaginal hysterectomy using bipolar vessel sealing: preliminary experience with 500 cases

Two Approaches of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Non-Prolapsed Uterus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A network meta-analysis of updated haemostatic strategies for hysterectomy

Conventional vaginal approach vs. transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for treating apical prolapse, a randomized controlled study

Feasibility of early discharge following vaginal hysterectomy with a bipolar electrocoagulation device

Perioperative Interventions to Minimize Blood Loss at the Time of Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Comparing perioperative vaginal misoprostol with intraoperative pericervical hemostatic tourniquet in reducing blood loss during abdominal myomectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Monopolar diathermy versus a vessel-sealing device for reducing postoperative drain output after simple mastectomy: randomized clinical trial

Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes

Outcomes of the Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealing Device and Electrocautery in Modified Radical Mastectomy Patients