Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results. However, sample size determination is not straightforward for mediation analysis of longitudinal design.METHODS:To facilitate planning the sample size for longitudinal mediation studies with a multilevel mediation model, this article provides the sample size required to achieve 80% power by simulations under various sizes of the mediation effect, within-subject correlations and numbers of repeated measures. The sample size calculation is based on three commonly used mediation tests: Sobel's method, distribution of product method and the bootstrap method.RESULTS:Among the three methods of testing the mediation effects, Sobel's method required the largest sample size to achieve 80% power. Bootstrapping and the distribution of the product method performed similarly and were more powerful than Sobel's method, as reflected by the relatively smaller sample sizes. For all three methods, the sample size required to achieve 80% power depended on the value of the ICC (i.e., within-subject correlation). A larger value of ICC typically required a larger sample size to achieve 80% power. Simulation results also illustrated the advantage of the longitudinal study design. The sample size tables for most encountered scenarios in practice have also been published for convenient use.CONCLUSIONS:Extensive simulations study showed that the distribution of the product method and bootstrapping method have superior performance to the Sobel's method, but the product method was recommended to use in practice in terms of less computation time load compared to the bootstrapping method. A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.

Suggested guidelines in reporting results from mediation analysis, standardized or unstandardized?

Mediation Analysis and Effect Size Measurement： Retrospect and Prospect

Handling Measurement Error and Omitted Confounders Considering Informativeness of the Confounding Effect under Mediation Modeling

Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers

Robust Mediation Analysis Based on Median Regression.

Dos and don'ts for conducting mediation analysis: A commentary with practical tips to avoid common problems.

Mediation with External Summary Statistic Information (MESSI)

A guideline for reporting mediation analyses of randomized trials and observational studies: the AGReMA statement

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Context of Clinical Research.

Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects.

Clinically Relevant Mediation Analysis using Controlled Indirect Effect

Sample Size Determination for Mediation Analysis of Longitudinal Data.

Causal Mediation Programs in R, Mplus, SAS, SPSS, and Stata

The Impact of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders on Statistical Inference of Mediation Effects and Tools for Sensitivity Analysis

Bayesian Mediation Analysis.

Mediation for Count Outcomes: Equivalence of the Mediated Effect

The Failings of Conventional Mediation Analysis and a Design-Based Alternative

Efficient Adjusted Joint Significance Test and Sobel-Type Confidence Interval for Mediation Effect

Power of Testing for Exposure Effects under Incomplete Mediation

Confounding in statistical mediation analysis: What it is and how to address it.

Statistical mediation analysis.