Abstract:Positive maps are useful for detecting entanglement in quantum information theory. Any entangled state can be detected by some positive map. In this paper, the relation between positive block matrices and completely positive trace-preserving maps is characterized. Consequently, a new method for constructing decomposable maps from positive block matrices is derived. In addition, a method for constructing positive but not completely positive maps from Hermitian block matrices is also obtained.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to construct positive maps in quantum information theory, especially the methods of constructing positive but not completely positive (PNCP) maps. Positive maps play an important role in detecting the entanglement properties of quantum states, because any entangled state can be detected by certain positive maps. The main contributions of the paper are as follows:
1. **The relationship between positive block matrices and completely positive trace - preserving maps**: The paper first explores the relationship between positive block matrices and completely positive trace - preserving maps, and on this basis, proposes a new method for constructing decomposable maps from positive block matrices.
2. **Constructing positive but not completely positive maps from Hermitian block matrices**: In addition, the paper also proposes a method for constructing positive but not completely positive maps from Hermitian block matrices.
Specifically, the innovation points of the paper include:
- **Theorem 3.1**: If \(A\) is a non - positive partial transpose (NPPT) matrix and satisfies certain conditions, then a positive but not completely positive map \(\Phi\) can be constructed through \(A\).
- **Theorem 4.1**: If \(A\) is a Hermitian matrix and satisfies certain specific conditions, then a positive but not completely positive map \(\Psi\) can be constructed through \(A\).
These methods not only enrich the construction means of positive maps, but also provide new tools for detecting the entanglement of quantum states. The paper shows the effectiveness of these methods through specific examples, such as:
- **Example 3.2**: Consider a \(3\otimes3\) density matrix \(\rho(a)\), and two decomposable maps \(\Phi_a^1\) and \(\Phi_a^2\) are constructed through Theorem 3.1.
- **Example 3.3**: Consider an \(m\otimes m\) Werner state \(\omega\), and a decomposable map \(\Phi_{m,x}^3\) is constructed through Theorem 3.1.
- **Example 3.4**: Consider an \(m\otimes m\) isotropic state \(\varsigma\), and a decomposable map \(\Phi_{m,y}^4\) is constructed through Theorem 3.1.
These results are not only of great significance in theory, but also provide new methods for detecting quantum entanglement in practical applications.