Abstract:Abstract That Occupational Health is a neglected field is a fact that has been discussed, deliberated and debated upon for many decades. In a developing country like India, where priorities in the delivery of preventive health services – whether publicly driven or privately promoted – the attention has always been focussed on several other aspects of public health including maternal and child health, family planning, infectious diseases and more recently non-communicable diseases. Occupational Health has always been given the short shrift – not only in the teaching of the subject at universities but also in the practice of medicine in hospitals. Authors have for long lamented about the absence of occupational history in patient records and the importance of the same. Evidently not much heed has been paid to Ramazzini’s circa 1700 plea to add that one more question: what occupation does he (the patient) follow? The International Labour Organisation identifies occupational health and safety as “the discipline dealing with the prevention of work-related injuries and diseases as well as the protection and promotion of the health of workers”. This definition lands the specialty directly into the laps of community health/medicine practitioners or those who were previously referred to specialists in “preventive and social medicine”. This term, probably, more accurately describes the mandate of a modern-day occupational health practitioner – if not elsewhere in the world, in developing nations. In India, wherever reference to Occupational Health is made in academic circles, it is considered to be the domain of Community Medicine – a subject that is a mandatory part of the course work leading to the award of the undergraduate MBBS degree. It was not surprising then that the Ross Institute of Occupational Health (a Unit of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) relocated from the tea-growing region of Jorhat in the state of Assam in Northeast India to the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine at St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore in South India. Though the exact reasons for this shift have been unclear, it was at the behest of South Indian plantations that a three-cornered link was created between the United Planters’ Association of Southern India (UPASI), the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine (now Community Health), St John’s Medical College (SJMC), Bangalore and the Ross Institute, London. The Occupational Health Unit (Ross Institute Unit of Occupational Health) was established at SJMC in July 1974. Fifty years ago, it was the first medical college with a division devoted to the health of the working population. During the initial years of its functioning, most of the work centered around the plantations in South India and to a smaller extent the agricultural sector in the rural field practice area of the College. This Unit went into decline within the first decade of its establishment – there are a number of reasons attributed to this fall; foremost among them being the loss of key personnel at all three organizations involved in the pioneering partnership. The Unit became practically non-functional in 1984. Following its resurrection, the Division is still one of the few providing occupational health services in any of the 700 medical colleges in the country. Almost fifteen years later, in 1997, it was serendipity that drew the author to the plantation sector. The focus of the health care services in the Estate Hospitals were on the provision of medical facilities for labouring mothers and their children; and on the provision of mandated housing, water supply and environmental sanitation. The health and welfare audits were initiated and developed with a focus on the preventive and promotive health services that were being provided by the Medical Officers of the tea estates. These are required by the Plantation Labour Act that governs the health and welfare services in the plantation sector. The concentration was on the provision of primary health care. These audits helped identify lacunae in the existing systems and provided solutions to the estate management. Over the years, the estates have ensured that health promotion, disease prevention and standards of treatment of common illnesses were maintained at the highest possible level. Despite facing challenges like falling prices of South Indian tea in the international auctions, the emigration of skilled workforce to other sectors and the immigration of uninitiated employees from East and Northeast India – the estates have succeeded in maintaining their superior primary health care indicators. The focus has now shifted to health and safety at the workplace. While initially these audits have been voluntarily employed by a few plantation companies to monitor the progress of their health services, others have also followed suit and ensured that the health, safety and welfare of the employees and their families are well taken care of. With decreasing absenteeism and the consequent improved productivity, companies have recognized the value of investing in the health of their employees. In the apparel manufacturing sector, the importance of investing in the health and welfare of employees was brought into focus in the 1990s by the growing concept of corporate social responsibility and was a direct reaction to the newfangled incursion of social compliance audits. This entire situation was an outcome of the outcry of university-going youth in the western world to the atrocious working conditions of employees in vendor factories in the global south manufacturing apparel for popular brands. The Department’s involvement started with the Occupational Health Services Division (no longer the Ross Institute Unit of Occupational Health) facilitating the establishment of functional crèches, canteens and clinics (3 Cs) for factories belonging to one large corporate organization in Bangalore. This caught the attention of international not-for-profit organizations which soon established links with the Occupational Health Services Division. Investing in the 3 Cs and promoting the health of employees through a peer education model were pioneering interventions that have found worldwide acceptance – thanks to the reach of our international partners. In recent years, the focus of our attention has shifted to the mental health of employees (and staff and management) – the investment in training and support provided to “lay counsellors” is already providing rich dividends to factories. Currently, research on the return-on-investment of these interventions is in progress. While dabbling with other occupational sectors, our third most significant sector has been the health care system. Starting with our own institution – St. John’s Medical College and its allied establishments (Hospital, Nursing College and Research Institute) employ more than 4000 individuals. The Staff Clinic is the fulcrum around which all the interventions are provided which include training in hospital health and safety, clinical services (care during acute illness and preventive health care including vaccinations) and environmental checks. “No survey without service” has been a long-standing dictum of the Department. In keeping with this, the published studies emanating from the Occupational Health Services Division have been rather muted. The reluctance of managements of our partnering companies to permit dissemination of data has also played its role in the relative paucity of published papers. Even so, small studies have been conducted and published – more in national and regional journals (where they are more relevant) and also in international publications. Our experiences over the past 25 years indicate that the initial focus on primary health care services makes for a better investment before moving on to occupational health and safety interventions. The faculty associated with the Occupational Health Services Division have made conscious efforts to teach Occupational Health to the undergraduate and postgraduate students – with specific focus on the lessons learnt in the field. Exposure visits to factories, plantations, mines and other work settings have given emphasis on the importance of occupational health and the impact of occupational exposures on health outcomes among employees. In a country where trained occupational health physicians are a rare breed, it is hoped that the training imparted to a small group of students will have a ripple-effect – calling to attention other medical colleges where the focus on the domain is poor. Simultaneously, drawing the attention of existing health care providers to basic occupational health services at the primary health care level both in the private and public health sectors through training programmes at the provincial level is the way forward.

Abstract:Individual performance, as one of the productivity components, is determined mainly by appropriate knowledge and skills, high work motivation, and good health status. At the enterprise level, productivity levels depend on many factors, including market forces, company policies, seasons, or societal situations such as the pandemic we are currently facing. Health is only one factor, interacting with other factors and influencing performance and ultimately, productivity. A person in a healthy state who has physical and emotional abilities, accompanied by a desire to work, will show high performance. Individual performance measures are generally based on time measures, namely absenteeism, which is not coming to work due to health problems, and presentism, namely unproductive time at work due to health problems. High worker performance will lead to higher productivity because it can produce better goods and services, more creativity and innovation, high intellectual capacity, and reliable resilience. High productivity can lead to higher profits. Many health conditions and health risks affect the decline in performance. The Healthy Workplace framework showed a high association between health conditions and health risks with absenteeism and presentism.1 Health risks associated with absenteeism include lack of physical activity, high stress, and diabetes. Diabetes is the highest risk factor for absenteeism, which increases the chance of absenteeism by 2.3 times (OR=2.29, 95% CI 1.17, 4.47). Stress most increased presentism odds (OR=2.09; 95% CI 1.65, 2.63), followed by unmet emotional needs (OR=1.93, 95% CI 1.52, 2.44). Other health risks were associated with presentism, including poor nutrition, body mass index and low physical activity.2 Chronic diseases such as hepatic disorders are a risk factor for young mining workers.3 WHO's Global Health Estimates provide the data that seven of the top ten causes of death globally are non-communicable diseases. Ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are the leading causes of death in high-income and lower-middle-income countries.4 The other study found that smoking, occupational risk, and air pollutants were high rank of COPD risk factors. These diseases generally occur in the working-age group, indicated by the prevalence of smoking, which is 31%, the prevalence of hypertension at the age of >18 years, which is 31.3% in men and 36.9% in women.5 The main nutritional problems in the working-age group based on the Indonesian Basic Health Survey 2018 were obesity (prevalence 21.8% at age >18 years), anemia (48.9% in pregnant women), and chronic energy deficiency (32%). The other health problems in this working age group were mental-emotional disorders (9.8%) with an increase compared to 6% in the Basic Health Survey 2013.5 The prevalence of anemia and chronic energy deficiency is still high in women of childbearing age who are also included in the productive age group.6,7 With a high participation rate of female workers and a high prevalence of chronic energy deficiency and anemia, nutritional problems are immense. In low-income countries, Infectious diseases, especially tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/AIDS, are also a health problem in the working-age population.4 Tuberculosis has a considerable impact on families. Studies in Indonesia show that although treatment is guaranteed through the National Health Insurance, households affected by TB still face the risk of poverty. Impoverishment occurs due to additional expenses outside of treatment for treatment, including reduced income due to not coming to work.8 The effect of health problem on worker productivity is getting bigger, along with the increasing risk of work accidents. The cost of per work accidents case in Europe is high; highest for The Netherlands (€ 73,410) and the lowest for Poland (€ 37,860). The total costs ranged from 2.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) for Finland to 10.2% for Poland. The cost calculation considered three categories: direct healthcare, indirect productivity, and intangible health-related quality of life costs.9 The most significant work accidents came from the construction and manufacturing sectors (32%), followed by the transportation sector (9%), forestry (4%), and mining (2%). Unfortunately, there is no exact data on the magnitude of occupational diseases. Indirect costs related to lost workdays, costs for absenteeism payments, and worker presentism were considerable. In addition, the burden of personal expenses incurred by workers for transportation costs and other costs to obtain health services decreases productivity. Medical, social and economic consequences of non-communicable diseases, occupational accidents and diseases, and nutritional problems lead to public health problems in the working population. The workplace-based intervention to overcome the workers' health problem by integrating occupational health services is a method of choice.10 Since 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched Workers' Health: A Global Plan of Action. The action plan responds to the importance of workers' health as a prerequisite for productivity and economic development through increasing access to health services for workers and building a healthy workplace.11 Furthermore, WHO introduced the Healthy Workplace Framework as practical guidance. A healthy workplace is a place where workers and managers work together continuously to make improvements to protect and promote the health, safety, and welfare of workers and workplace sustainability. There are four interrelated factors: a) health and safety in the physical environment, b) health, safety, and wellbeing in the psychosocial environment, including workplace organization and work culture, c) health resources in the workplace; and d) workplace community participation to improve the health of workers, their families, and the surroundings.1 The implementation of the healthy workplace program needs supporting evidence on workplace-based intervention through relevant research. This is what this special issue on Occupational Health of the Acta Medica Philippina is facilitating. Prof. Muchtaruddin Mansyur, MD, PhDDepartment of Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia REFERENCES Burton J. WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model: Background and Supporting Literature and Practices. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010. p. 123. Available from: https://www.who.int/occupational_health/WHO_health_assembly_en_web.pdf Boles M, Pelletier B, Lynch W. The relationship between health risks and work productivity. J Occup Environ Med. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 24]. Available from: doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000131830.45744.97 PMID: 15247814. Mansyur M, Jen Fuk L. Mining workers, administrative task, obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and young workers increased risk liver function elevation among Indonesian male workers April 201875(Suppl 2):A244.2-A244 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-ICOHabstracts.697. BMJ Occup Environ Med [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 24]. 2018;75(Suppl 2):224. Available from: https://oem.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/A244.2 World Health Organisation. Top Ten Cause of Death 15 August 2007 [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 24], Geneva: World Health Organisation. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan. Hasil Utama Riskesdas 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 24]. Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2019. 220 p. Available from: https://kesmas.kemkes.go.id/assets/upload/dir_519d41d8cd98f00/files/Hasil-riskesdas-2018_1274.pdf Reskia RN, Hadju V, Indriasari R, Muis M. Anemia, chronic energy deficiency and their relationship in preconception women. Enfermería Clínica. 2020; 30 (Suppl. 6):76-80 Msemo OA, Bygbjerg IC, Møller SL, Nielsen BB, Ødum L, Perslev K, et al. (2018) Prevalence and risk factors of preconception anemia: a community-based cross-sectional study of rural women of reproductive age in Northeastern Tanzania. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0208413. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208413 Fuady A, Houweling TAJ, Mansyur M, Richardus JH. Catastrophic total costs in tuberculosis-affected households and their determinants since Indonesia’s implementation of universal health coverage. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018; 7(1). Tompa E, Mofidi A, van den Heuvel S, van Bree T, Michaelsen F, Jung Y, et al. Economic burden of work injuries and diseases: a framework and application in five European Union countries. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(49). doi:10.1186/s12889-020-10050-7 Mansyur M, Khoe LC, Karman MM, Ilyas M. Improving workplace-based intervention in Indonesia to prevent and control anemia. J Prim Care Community Heal. 2019; 10. World Health Organization. Workers’ health: global plan of action. In: Sixtieth World Health Assembly Agenda. 23 May 2007 [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 24]. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. p. Available from: https://www.who.int/occupational_health/WHO_health_assembly_en_web.pdf

Occupational health in the Philippines

Occupational Safety and Health amid the Global Pandemic

Global occupational health: current challenges and the need for urgent action

To think about resistance force in preventing hospital occupational disease/injury

Status of Occupational Health and Safety in Nepal: Current Scenario and Strategies for Improvement

Pandemic Impact, Support Received, and Policies for Health Worker Retention: An Environmental Scan

Integration of basic occupational health services into primary health care in Thailand: Current situation and progress

SS72-01 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH TRAINING IN INDIA – CURRENT STATUS AND CHALLENGES

Development and maturation of the occupational health services research field in the United States over the past 25 years: Challenges and opportunities for the future

[Health and safety challenges in medical entities and the powers of the social labor inspector: Lessons related to the COVID-19 outbreak in the context of internal control of employee health and safety]

Enterprise-Based Participatory Action Research in the Development of a Basic Occupational Health Service Model in Thailand

Occupational Health and Safety Hazards among Workers in Laboratory Animal Research Facilities in Singapore and Philippines

Occupational medicine at the verge of the twenty first century: evaluation of accomplished and expected changes in the preventive approach

One health in the Philippines: A review and situational analysis

Occupational Safety and Health Management in Selected Industrial Sectors in Sudan

P-088 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PREVENTION IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN JAVA ISLAND, INDONESIA

PL06 DEVELOPMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES IN A MEDICAL COLLEGE SETTING IN INDIA – LOOKING BACK OVER 25 YEARS TO INFORM THE FUTURE

Occupational safety and health regulations and implementation challenges in Uganda

Link Between Migration Status and Occupational Health and Safety of Filipino Migrant Workers in South Korea

Occupational Health, Productivity and Evidence-Based Workplace Health Intervention

Occupational health nursing: realities and challenges