Abstract:Abstract Purpose We present a systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping to serve two primary purposes: First, to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review so that researchers may apply the procedure to the review of a scientific domain of their own interest, and second, to identify major areas of research activities concerning science mapping, intellectual milestones in the development of key specialties, evolutionary stages of major specialties involved, and the dynamics of transitions from one specialty to another. Design/methodology/approach We first introduce a theoretical framework of the evolution of a scientific specialty. Then we demonstrate a generic search strategy that can be used to construct a representative dataset of bibliographic records of a domain of research. Next, progressively synthesized co-citation networks are constructed and visualized to aid visual analytic studies of the domain’s structural and dynamic patterns and trends. Finally, trajectories of citations made by particular types of authors and articles are presented to illustrate the predictive potential of the analytic approach. Findings The evolution of the science mapping research involves the development of a number of interrelated specialties. Four major specialties are discussed in detail in terms of four evolutionary stages: conceptualization, tool construction, application, and codification. Underlying connections between major specialties are also explored. The predictive analysis demonstrates citations trajectories of potentially transformative contributions. Research limitations The systematic review is primarily guided by citation patterns in the dataset retrieved from the literature. The scope of the data is limited by the source of the retrieval, i.e. the Web of Science, and the composite query used. An iterative query refinement is possible if one would like to improve the data quality, although the current approach serves our purpose adequately. More in-depth analyses of each specialty would be more revealing by incorporating additional methods such as citation context analysis and studies of other aspects of scholarly publications. Practical implications The underlying analytic process of science mapping serves many practical needs, notably bibliometric mapping, knowledge domain visualization, and visualization of scientific literature. In order to master such a complex process of science mapping, researchers often need to develop a diverse set of skills and knowledge that may span multiple disciplines. The approach demonstrated in this article provides a generic method for conducting a systematic review. Originality/value Incorporating the evolutionary stages of a specialty into the visual analytic study of a research domain is innovative. It provides a systematic methodology for researchers to achieve a good understanding of how scientific fields evolve, to recognize potentially insightful patterns from visually encoded signs, and to synthesize various information so as to capture the state of the art of the domain.

Scienceography: the study of how science is written

A Scienceographic Comparison of Physics Papers from the arXiv and viXra Archives

Science of science: A multidisciplinary field studying science

Science Mapping to study academic knowledge circulation

Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science

The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future

An overview of the history of Science of Science in China based on the use of bibliographic and citation data: a new method of analysis based on clustering with feature maximization and contrast graphs

Making sense of the evolution of a scientific domain: a visual analytic study of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey research

What counts as Aesthetics in Science? A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of the Scientific Literature from 1970 to 2018.

Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Scito2M: A 2 Million, 30-Year Cross-disciplinary Dataset for Temporal Scientometric Analysis

Scientometric engineering: Exploring citation dynamics via arXiv eprints

Science Hard and Soft: An Empirical Approach to Evaluating Scientific Consensus with Big Data

Modelling the Structure and Dynamics of Science Using Books

Delineating Knowledge Domains in the Scientific Literature Using Visual Information

Scientometrics of Big Science: a Case Study of Research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Decoding the writing styles of disciplines: A large-scale quantitative analysis

Visual Analysis of Scientific Discoveries and Knowledge Diffusion

Understanding Writing Styles of Scientific Papers in the IS-LS Domain: Evidence from Abstracts over the Past Three Decades

Public scientists contributing to local literary fiction. An exploratory analysis

Disciplinary Differences of Software Use and Impact in Scientific Literature