Abstract:ObjectivesTo investigate the outcomes of internal ureteral stent versus ureteroscopy (URS) treatments for pregnant women with urolithiasis.DesignThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that investigated the outcomes of internal ureteral stent and ureteroscopy for pregnancy with urolithiasis. This systematic review have been registered on the PROSPERO website (www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd, registration number: CRD42020195607).Data SourcesRelevant studies published from January 1980 to April 2020 were identified through a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.Data extraction and synthesisAll pregnant women in their all pregnancy stages who were underwent double-J (D-J) stent insertion only or URS operation for lithotripsy/stone extraction/exploration were considered. The number of related participants in study more than 10 were included. Fertility outcome and complications of intervention were extracted as main outcomes, while other data such as operation success rate, stone free rate (SFR), patient characteristics, anaesthetic method, ureteral stone characteristics, detail of interventions were obtained as well. Complications were stratified according to Clavien-Dindo criteria. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Study-specific prevalence rates were pooled using a random-effects model. We applied the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.ResultsA total of 25 studies were identified with 131 cases undergoing serial stenting and 789 cases undergoing URS operation. The age range was from 16 to 41, and urolithiasis occurred in the second trimester most. Ultrasound was the most commonly used diagnostic method. The most common site of calculi was distal ureter. The average stone size was between 6-17mm. There were 6 studies investigating D-J stent insertion only, while 23 studies involving URS operation. The most commonly used anesthesia for internal ureteral stent therapy was local anesthesia, and for URS treatments, general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia were widely used. The pooled operation success rate was 97% for D-J stent insertion, and 99% for URS. Serial D-J stenting was an effective methods for treating ureter obstruction and only a few patients passed stone spontaneously. Different common lithotripters were used in URS operations and the pooled SFR was about 91%. For internal ureteral stent therapy; the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99%, but the pooled incidence of complications was about 45%. For the URS treatment group, the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99% as well, and the pooled incidence of complications was about 1%. However, the pooled premature and abortion incidence rate of two group were the same as less than 1%, and the same as this in serious complication incidence rate.ConclusionsBoth ureteroscopy operation and internal ureteral stent were usually used for handing pregnancy with urolithiasis. Two treatments had less side effective on fertility outcome, but internal ureteral stent may cause more complications. Evidence suggests that URS therapy may have a greater advantage for pregnancy with urolithiasis when the conditions permit. As it is proved safe and effective, internal ureteral stent could be considered at emergency condition or preoperative preparations was lack.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Urolithiasis in pregnancy: Advances in imaging modalities and evaluation of current trends in endourological approaches

Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incidence of kidney stones in pregnancy and associations with adverse obstetrical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4.7 million pregnancies

Management of biliary lithiasis in pregnancy – an updated overview

Management of Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Multi-Disciplinary Guidelines From an Academic Medical Center

Surgical management of obstructing ureteral stones during pregnancy: A systematic review of different techniques

Minimally-invasive Stone Removal in Urinary Calculi Patients During Pregnancy: Clinical Therapeutic Effects and Low Complications.

Safety and Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Management of Ureteric Calculi in Pregnancy-Experience of a Tertiary Care Center

Surgical interventions for symptomatic urinary stones during pregnancy

A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Outcomes Of Pregnancy In Ckd And Ckd Outcomes In Pregnancy

Pregnancy outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Invasive Management of Proximal Ureteral Calculi During Pregnancy.

Re: Isen Et Al.: Experience with the Diagnosis and Management of Symptomatic Ureteric Stones During Pregnancy (urology 2012;79:508-512)

Maternal-Fetal Complications in Renal Colic during Pregnancy: A Scoping Review

Effect of maternal zinc supplementation or zinc status on pregnancy complications and perinatal outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses

Application of Ureteroscope in Emergency Treatment with Persistent Renal Colic Patients during Pregnancy

Risk factors for nephrolithiasis formation: An Umbrella Review

Management of symptomatic ureteral calculi during pregnancy: Experience of 23 cases

The influence of perioperative nursing intervention in patients with ureteral calculi treated with URSL and its correlation to adverse event incidence: A retrospective study