Aerodynamic Parameters in Byzantine Chant Voices: Comparisons Across Pitch and Loudness

Dimitrios S. Delviniotis,Sergios Theodoridis,Nektaria Delvinioti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.12.021
IF: 2.3
2024-01-22
Journal of Voice
Abstract:Summary Objective This study was designed to assess the impact of phonation frequency and loudness increase on aerodynamic parameters of the singing voice in Byzantine chant (BC). Design Aerodynamic measurements in BC were obtained and statistically analyzed. Method Fifteen experienced BC chanters, all baritones, performed the ascending notes G2, C3, E3, G3, C4, E4, and G4, at normal and high levels of loudness within a mask, while repeating strings of /pi/ syllables. The parameters of airflow (FR), subglottal pressure (Psub), and sound pressure level (SPL) were directly measured, and from them, the glottal flow resistance (Rg) and vocal efficiency (VE) were calculated. All the parameters' values were statistically analyzed. Results Statistically significant differences for FR, Psub, and SPL parameters in BC between the two loudness levels, at constant pitch, and for Psub, SPL, Rg, and VE among different pitches, at constant loudness levels were detected. When loudness increases, a) only the mean values of FR, Psub, and SPL, within C3–C4, increase, whereas those of Rg and VE do not show any change, and b) at G2, only the mean Psub increases, while in the upper range E4–G4, both mean SPL and mean VE decrease. When pitch is raised, a) for each level of loudness, within G2–E4 pitch range, the means of Psub, SPL, Rg, and VE increase while this is not the case for FR, and b) in the highest range (E4–G4), average SPL and VE drop while Rg and Psub remain stable. Our findings suggest that: a) most participants increase Psub and SPL without modification of Rg when loudness increases, and b) most participants increase both SPL and Psub while changing Rg with pitch rise. Idiosyncratic differences among the participants were detected in Rg and Psub, because of pitch rise, and, also, in Rg and VE due to loudness increase. Conclusions The results from this study reveal that, within the C3–C4 pitch range: a) there is independent control between the loudness and glottal adduction, and b) Psub is the main tool for increasing both the loudness and SPL. For some exceptions among the participants, either the Rg alteration or other modifications of the vocal system are, possibly, the cause of the loudness increase. The increased mean values of SPL, Rg, and Psub with pitch rise, for most participants, suggest that both glottal adduction and Psub increase together with the SPL and pitch increase. The VE increase within G2–E4 pitches reaches a maximum value at E4. Some exceptions among the participants exist that suggest the possible use of different phonatory strategies when changing either the pitch or the vocal loudness.
otorhinolaryngology,audiology & speech-language pathology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?