Abstract:Background Central venous catheters are commonly used in healthcare, but they come with a range of potential complications. Over the last 15 years, an influx of securement and dressing products have been released, with unknown overall effectiveness to prevent these complications. Objective To compare the effects of dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters on a range of common complications including catheter-related bloodstream infection, catheter tip colonisation, entry/exit-site infection, skin colonisation, skin irritation, failed catheter securement, dressing durability and mortality. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods Following standard Cochrane methods, a systematic search of Cochrane Wounds Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, EBSCO CINAHL, and multiple clinical trial registries was completed in November 2022. Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of dressing and securement devices for all CVC types were included. A random-effects model was used during the meta-analysis. Results were expressed using risk ratio (RR), rate ratio, or mean difference (MD), with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological quality and bias were assessed. Results We included 46 studies involving 10,054 participants. All studies had either an unclear or high-performance bias. The blinding of outcome assessment was unclear in most studies. Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings, compared with standard polyurethane dressings, may reduce the incidence (7 studies; N = 5816; RR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.44–0.83; low certainty evidence) and rate (4 studies; N = 4447; RR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.32–0.79; moderate certainty evidence) of catheter-related bloodstream infection and catheter tip colonisation (8 studies; N = 4788; RR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.52–0.95; very low certainty evidence). Medication-impregnated dressings may reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (6 studies; N = 5687; RR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.39–0.93; low certainty evidence) and catheter-tip colonisation (7 studies; N = 4769; RR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.47–0.76; low certainty evidence) relative to non-impregnated dressing types. Tissue adhesive may increase the risk of skin irritation or damage compared with integrated securement dressings (3 studies; N = 166; RR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.09–3.24; low certainty evidence) or sutureless securement devices (4 studies; N = 241; RR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.10–2.44; moderate certainty evidence). Tissue adhesive increased dressing durability compared with integrated securement dressings (MD 43.03 h, 95 % CI 4.88–81.18; moderate certainty evidence) and sutureless securement devices (MD 42.90 h, 4.64–81.16; moderate certainty evidence). Tissue adhesive increased failed catheter securement rate compared with suture (2 studies; N = 103; RR 9.33, 95 % CI 1.10–79.21; moderate certainty evidence). Conclusions The findings of the review provide insights and guidance for clinicians in selecting the appropriate dressings and securements for catheters. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in catheters and patient types. Registration #CD010367. Tweetable abstract Time to implement chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections; a meta-analysis by @GraceNP and team.

The influence of hand hygiene prior to insertion of peripheral venous catheters on the frequency of complications

The Effects of Handgrip Exercise in Reducing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Venous Thrombosis:A Meta-analysis

Effectiveness and safety of measures to prevent infections and other complications associated with peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

[Prevention of infections transmitted by intravascular devices (catheters, implanted sites)]

Observational study of peripheral intravenous catheter outcomes in an internal medicine department

Impact of a training strategy on improving compliance of hand hygiene and gloving during the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter: the multicentre study CleanHand4

Efficacy of two antiseptic regimens on skin colonization of insertion sites for two different catheter types: a randomized, clinical trial

Impact of sterile gloving during proximal manipulation of central line catheter hub: the multicenter observational study CleanHandPROX

Related factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated infections and prevention measures

Analysis the Effect of the Comprehensive Appraisal of Clinical Department to Improve Hand Hygiene Compliance

Effectiveness of transparent film dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter

The Practice of Arterial Catheters in ICUs and Nurses’ Perceptions of Infection Prevention: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study

Insertion site and risk of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization and/or local infection: a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 study including more than 800 catheters

Prevention of hospital infections by intervention and training (PROHIBIT): results of a pan-European cluster-randomized multicentre study to reduce central venous catheter …

Compare the efficacy of recommended peripheral intravascular cannula insertion practices with a standard protocol: A randomized control trial

Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care

The effectiveness of dressings and securement devices to prevent central venous catheter-associated complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Complications of upper extremity versus lower extremity placed peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care units: A meta-analysis

Association between peripheral intravenous catheters and clinical characteristics in the development of phlebitis

Sustained reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections with enhancement of catheter bundle by chlorhexidine dressings over 11 years

[Infections due to central catheterizations in a cardiac intensive care unit: an evaluation of 6 months of continuous surveillance. The nursing personnel of a cardiac intensive care unit]