Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to examine the effect of the corporate ethical approach on the cost of equity capital. This study is conducted on a large international sample on behalf of the world’s most engaged firms from an ethical point of view in 2015. Design/methodology/approach The multivariate linear regression model is used to meet the purpose of this study and research hypotheses are also examined using a sample of 80 of most ethical firms in the world during the year 2015. Moreover, three variables (i.e. business ethics, corporate social responsibility and executive compensation based on the achievement of sustainable development goals) are used to reflect the corporate ethical approach and the implied cost of equity capital is used for estimating the cost of equity. In this regard, equity cost estimation is the most appropriate approach to test the effect of business ethics on the cost of financing firms. Findings Based on a sample of 80 firms emerging as the world’s most ethical firms in 2015, the results revealed that firms with better ethics scores are significantly associated with a reduced cost of equity capital. This paper also demonstrates that the executive incentive pays that are based on the objectives of sustainable development are able to explain different outcomes regarding the relation between corporate ethical behaviors and the cost of equity. These findings support arguments in the literature that firms with socially responsible practices have a higher valuation and lower risk. Originality/value This study provides implications for global regulators and policymakers when setting social reporting standards, suggesting that corporate ethical engagement reduces the cost of equity capital by decreasing the information asymmetry and thereby reducing the firms’ risk. Therefore, the findings may be informative to international managers and investors when considering the effect of business ethics on the firm’s ex-ante cost of equity. In this perspective, the voluntary disclosure of information makes it possible to mitigate the problems of asymmetry of information and conflict of interest between the firm and its main providers of capital, which could reduce the cost of equity.

Does it pay to be socially connected with wall street brokerages? Evidence from cost of equity

The Stock Market Implication of Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Dividend Policy

Managerial Professional Connections Versus Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Access to Informal Financing Resources

Social capital and cost of debt: Evidence from Chinese CEO network centrality

Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia

Social connections between media and firm executives and the properties of media reporting

Do Social Connections Mitigate Hold-Up and Facilitate Cooperation? Evidence from Supply Chain Relationships

Friends in Need are Friends Indeed: An Analysis of Social Ties between Financial Analysts and Mutual Fund Managers

The Theory and Evidence of Cross-shareholders between Banks and Firms:International Comparison

Employee stock ownership and cost of capital: Evidence from the S&P 500

Do Affiliated Bankers on Board Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility? US Evidence

Corporate social activities and stock price crash risk in the banking industry: International evidence

Do Social Connections Mitigate Hold-up? Evidence from Relation-Specific Investment and Innovation in Vertical Relationships

Boardroom networks and corporate investment

CEO Connectedness and Firm Transparency

Social media and cost of debt financing: Evidence from stock forum text analysis

Social trust and the cost of equity

Does CEO social capital affect corporate ESG performance?

Financial analyst coverage and corporate social performance: Evidence from natural experiments

Corporate ethical behavior and the cost of equity capital: evidence from the world’s most ethical companies

Social capital, independent director connectedness, and stock price crash risk