TAP block and low‐dose NCA for major upper abdominal surgery

Oliver W. Masters,K. Thies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03468.x
2011-01-01
Paediatric Anaesthesia
Abstract:Sir—The transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block provides significant surgical and long-lasting postoperative analgesia in neonates and infants undergoing unilateral laparotomy (1,2). To date, there are no reports on using subcostal TAP block for major pediatric upper abdominal surgery via supra-umbilical transverse incision. We would therefore like to present the case of a 5-month-old girl (6.4 kg), who underwent a Bianchi procedure (3). Epidural analgesia for pain control was discussed, but declined by the parents. She was born at term via cesarean section for breech presentation in labor and underwent laparotomy on day two of life for intestinal obstruction. Atretic bowel from proximal jejunum to mid-transverse colon was found, and jejunocolic anastomosis was performed. Her postoperative recovery was complicated by shortbowel syndrome, and she was transferred to our institution for surgical management. Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in oxygen. IV access was obtained, and rocuronium at a dose of 1 mgÆkg was given to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Bilateral subcostal TAP blocks (4) were sited under ultrasound guidance with a SonoSite Micromaxx portable ultrasound and 13–6 MHz 25 mm ‘hockeystick’ probe. Needle and probe were positioned as illustrated in Figure 1. Once the fascia dividing the transverse abdominis muscle and the internal oblique was identified, a 21 G hypodermic needle was inserted at an angle no >10 to the skin to enhance sonographic visibility. Care was taken to ensure the needle tip was visualized prior to needle advancement to reduce the risk of peritoneal puncture. Needle position in the TAP was confirmed by injection of a small amount of local anesthetic. The needle was subsequently levelled to an angle of zero degrees and its tip visualized during further advancement along the costal margin A total of 0.5 mlÆkg of 0.25% levobupivacaine was deposited onto each side. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane at an end-tidal concentration of 1.0% in a 30% oxygen and air mixture throughout. Intermittent boluses of rocuronium at a dose of 0.5 mgÆkg were used to facilitate positive pressure ventilation. Surgery was performed via a transverse supra-umbilical laparotomy with incision extending from left to right anterior axillary line. Prior to the induction of anesthesia, the heart rate was 135 b.p.m and blood pressure 79/40 mmHg. There was no physiological response to skin incision. Both heart rate and blood pressure remained within 20% of baseline values throughout the case. Occasional boluses of fentanyl at a dose of 1–2 mcgÆkg were used to cover the visceral pain not covered by the TAP block. In total, 10 mcgÆkg of fentanyl was used throughout the 6-h procedure. After skin closure, the child was extubated awake in the operating theater prior to transfer to the recovery area. Nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA) with morphine was commenced at a background infusion rate of 4 mcgÆkgÆh as opposed to our standard rate of 10 mcgÆkgÆh. Bolus dose and lockout were left unchanged at 20 mcgÆkg and 20 min, respectively. Regular intravenous paracetamol was prescribed at a dose of 15 mgÆkg 6 hourly. Pain scores via the FLACC scoring system were recorded hourly for the first 37 h, at which point the NCA was discontinued because of minimal usage. Twelve morphine boluses were administered over this period, giving a total of 388 mcgÆkg. Morphine consumption for the first 24 h was 11.5 mcgÆkgÆh. Maximal pain score recorded was 2 on the scoring system. The parents reported a Figure 1 Diagram illustrating probe position, needle insertion (arrow) and approximate spread of local anaesthetic (shaded area).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?