Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22–24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial
Ronald E. Jung,Lily V. Brügger,Stefan P. Bienz,Jürg Hüsler,Christoph H. F. Hämmerle,Nicola U. Zitzmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13845
2021-10-03
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Abstract:AimThe aim was to evaluate the performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable or non-resorbable membranes compared to implants placed in pristine bone without bone regeneration after an observation period of 22-24 years. Material and MethodsThe patient cohort of this clinical trial was treated from 1994 to 1996. Dehiscence defects were treated with GBR by either using resorbable collagen membranes (BG) or non-resorbable ePTFE membranes (GT). Implants placed in pristine bone served as a control (CT). Clinical parameters, marginal bone levels and technical outcomes were evaluated following restoration placement and at the present follow-up. A 3D radiographic analysis was conducted in order to assess buccal and oral bone dimensions. Implant survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and a frailty model (level of significance 5%). ResultsOut of the originally 72 patients (mean age 75.4±15.70 years) with 265 implants, 39 patients with 147 implants were included in study after a median period of 23.5 years. Implant survival was 89.3% in group BG (n= 100), 90.2% in group GT (n= 37), and 93.8% in group CT (n= 105), without significant differences (Frailty proportional hazard model p=0.79). Smoking had a negative effect on survival (p=0.0122). Mean vertical marginal bone levels were -2.3±1.4mm (BG, n= 59), -3.0±1.5mm (GT, n= 21) and -2.3±1.6mm (CT, n=52). The vertical buccal bone levels were -3.0±1.9mm (BG, n= 57), -3.5±2.2mm (GT, n= 21) and -2.6±1.8mm (CT, n= 49), without significant differences. ConclusionImplant placement with GBR procedures provides treatment outcomes with favorable implant survival rates (89.3%-93.8%) after 23.5 years. Smoking, however, affected implant survival negatively.
engineering, biomedical,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine