Hedging: Scaling and the Investor Horizon

John Cotter,Jim Hanly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1103.5966

2011-03-30

Abstract:This paper examines the volatility and covariance dynamics of cash and futures contracts that underlie the Optimal Hedge Ratio (OHR) across different hedging time horizons. We examine whether hedge ratios calculated over a short term hedging horizon can be scaled and successfully applied to longer term horizons. We also test the equivalence of scaled hedge ratios with those calculated directly from lower frequency data and compare them in terms of hedging effectiveness. Our findings show that the volatility and covariance dynamics may differ considerably depending on the hedging horizon and this gives rise to significant differences between short term and longer term hedges. Despite this, scaling provides good hedging outcomes in terms of risk reduction which are comparable to those based on direct estimation.

Risk Management,Statistical Finance

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are: the effectiveness of the optimal hedging ratio (OHR) and the changes in volatility and covariance dynamics within different hedging time horizons. Specifically, the author explores the following aspects:

1. **Whether the hedging ratio in a short - time horizon can be extended and successfully applied to a longer - time horizon**:
- The author studies whether the hedging ratio calculated from short - term data can be applied to a longer - time horizon by some method (such as the scaling law), and whether these extended ratios are still effective.

2. **The equivalence and effectiveness comparison between the hedging ratio calculated directly from low - frequency data and the extended ratio**:
- The researcher compares the differences between the hedging ratio obtained by the scaling law and the ratio estimated directly from low - frequency data, and evaluates their effects in terms of risk reduction.

3. **The impact of different time horizons on the hedging effect**:
- The author analyzes how the changes in volatility and covariance dynamics affect the hedging effect as the hedging time horizon increases. Research shows that as the time horizon increases, the hedging effect may be significantly different.

4. **Introducing new evaluation criteria to measure the effectiveness of hedging**:
- In addition to the traditional percentage of variance reduction, the author also introduces two new evaluation criteria: VaR (Value at Risk) and CVaR (Conditional Value at Risk) to more comprehensively evaluate the performance of hedging strategies within different time horizons.

5. **The impact of the level of volatility persistence on different hedging time horizons**:
- The researcher analyzes the changes in volatility persistence within different time horizons and explores its impact on future hedging effects. In particular, they use the GARCH model to estimate the time - varying OHR and study the predictive ability of these models in a longer hedging time horizon.

### Formula Summary

- **Optimal Hedging Ratio (OHR)**:
\[
\text{OHR}=\frac{\text{Cov}(r_s, r_f)}{\text{Var}(r_f)}
\]
where \( r_s \) is the spot return and \( r_f \) is the futures return.

- **Percentage of Variance Reduction**:
\[
\text{% Variance Reduction}=\left[1 - \frac{\text{VARIANCE(Portfolio Hedged)}}{\text{VARIANCE(Portfolio Unhedged)}}\right]\times100\%
\]

- **VaR**:
\[
\text{VaR}_{\alpha}=q_{\alpha}
\]
where \( q_{\alpha} \) is the \(\alpha\) - quantile of the loss distribution.

- **CVaR**:
\[
\text{CVaR}_{\alpha}=\mathbb{E}[L | L > \text{VaR}_{\alpha}]
\]
where \( L \) is the loss.

Through these formulas and analyses, the author aims to provide in - depth insights into the effectiveness of hedging strategies within different time horizons and provide valuable references for financial risk management.