Abstract:Large-diameter monopiles are the predominant foundation solution for supporting offshore wind turbines. They are conventionally designed using soil reaction curves developed for long slender piles used for supporting offshore oil and gas platforms (e.g., the API p-y model). However, due to the difference in the length/diameter ratio and the resulting soil mechanisms, the use of p-y curves alone can lead to significant under-prediction of the lateral stiffness and capacity of monopiles. To overcome the shortcoming, the authors have previously proposed a conceptual two-spring framework, i.e., the so-called 'p-y + M-R-theta(R)' model, to capture the monopile response in soft clay under lateral loading. The framework uses distributed p-y springs to consider the lateral soil resistance along the pile above the rotation point (RP) and a single moment-rotation (M-R-theta(R)) spring attached at the RP to capture the entire soil resistance below the RP, i.e., the distributed resistance along the pile, base shear and base moment at the pile tip. The proposed p-y and M-R-theta(R) springs were curve-fitted to the results of 3D numerical analyses. However, as the stress-strain response and the shear strength profile inevitably influence the p-y and M-R-theta(R) springs, the applicability of the empirical formulations to soil conditions other than those examined is uncertain. This study proposes an enhancement to the 'p-y + M-R-theta(R)' framework, in which the p-y and M-R-theta(R) springs are not tied to a specific soil and strength profile but fundamentally linked to the properties that can be measured directly in the site investigation and laboratory. This extension is achieved through analytical analyses and an extensive parametric numerical study. The predictive capabilities of the model are demonstrated by back-analyses of finite element analyses and centrifuge model tests. The proposed model provides practising engineers with a simple yet powerful approach to use site-specific soil reaction curves in the design of monopiles embedded in soft clay.

Three-spring soil reaction model for wind turbine monopile foundation in clay

Site-specific soil reaction model for monopiles in soft clay based on laboratory element stress-strain curves

Timoshenko Beam Theory–based Analytical Solution of Laterally Loaded Large-Diameter Monopiles

A Unified Lateral Soil Reaction Model for Monopiles in Soft Clay Considering Various Length-to-diameter (L/D) Ratios

Centrifuge Modelling of Lateral Loading Behaviour of a “Semi-Rigid” Mono-pile in Soft Clay

Lateral Cyclic Pile–soil Interaction Studies on a Rigid Model Monopile

A Numerical Study on the Lateral Loading Behaviour of Offshore Tetrapod Piled Jacket Foundations in Clay

Numerical study on soil springs stiffnesses of laterally loaded monopiles

DETERMINATION ON CRITICAL DEPTH OF MONOPILE IN SAND UNDER CYCLIC HORIZONTAL LOAD

Analytical Solution for Natural Frequency of Monopile Supported Wind Turbine Towers

Field Trials on Monotonic Behaviour of a Driven Pile at an Offshore Wind Farm in China

A Simple Rotational Spring Model for Laterally Loaded Rigid Piles in Sand

Numerical Simulation of Offshore Monopiles with Reinforcement in Shallow Soil Layer

Modified P-Y Curves for Monopile Foundation with Different Length-to-diameter Ratio

Influence of Pile Diameter and Aspect Ratio on the Lateral Response of Monopiles in Sand with Different Relative Densities

Derivation and Validation of Soil-Pile-Interaction Models for Offshore Wind Turbines

Study on Failure Mechanism and Soil Resistance for Laterally-Loaded Large-Diameter Monopiles

A modified Nonlinear Foundation Beam model for half-rigid monopiles with Timoshenko representation and compatible soil springs in sand

Bearing capacity and deflection behaviors of large diameter monopile foundations in sand seabed

A Bounding-Surface-based Cyclic "P-Y Plus M-θ" Model for Unified Description of Laterally Loaded Piles with Different Failure Modes in Clay

Multi-springs Model for Suction Caisson under Monotonic Lateral Loading