Abstract:Background: There is growing evidence that the alcohol industry seeks to obstruct public health policies that might affect future alcohol sales. In parallel, the alcohol industry funds organisations that engage in "responsible drinking" campaigns. Evidence is growing that the content and delivery of such campaigns serves industry, rather than public health interests, yet these organizations continue to be the subject of partnerships with government health departments. This study aimed to examine the nature and potential impacts of such partnerships by analysing the practices of the alcohol industry-funded charity Drinkaware during the establishment of the Drink Free Days campaign. Methods: A case study based on an inductive analysis of documents revealed by freedom of information (FoI) request regarding communications between Drinkaware, Public Health England (PHE), and the Portman Group, in the years running up to, and during, the Drink Free Days campaign, a partnership between alcohol industry-funded charity Drinkware, and PHE. Results: This study reveals a range of less visible, system-level effects of such partnerships for government departments and civil society. The tensions observed, as exhibited by discrepancies between internal and external communications, the emphasis on managing and mitigating the perception of negative consequences, and the links to wider alcohol industry initiatives and bodies, suggest the need for wider considerations of organizational conflicts of interest, and of possible indirect, harmful consequences to policy-making. These include the marginalization of other civil society voices, the displacing of more effective policy options, and strategic alignment with other industry lobbying activities. Conclusion: The findings have implications for how public health practitioners and health organisations might better weigh the potential trade-offs of partnership in the context of health promotion campaigns.

Diageo, University College Dublin and the integrity of alcohol science: it’s time to draw the line between public health and public relations

An invitation to an alcohol industry lobby to help decide public funding of alcohol research and professional training: a decision that should be reversed.

Science and the drinks industry: cause for concern

The alcohol industry and public interest science

Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: issues, concerns and conflicts of interest

Under the influence: system-level effects of alcohol industry-funded health information organizations

Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry’s corporate social responsibility activities

Marketing alcohol to young people: implications for industry regulation and research policy

"I Wouldn't Be Friends with Someone If They Were Liking Too Much Rubbish": A Qualitative Study of Alcohol Brands, Youth Identity and Social Media

The integrity of the science base: a test case

Exposure to Digital Alcohol Marketing and Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review

Vested interests in addiction research and policy. The challenge corporate lobbying poses to reducing society's alcohol problems: insights from UK evidence on minimum unit pricing

The Ubiquitous Experience of Alcohol Industry Involvement in Science: Findings From a Qualitative Interview Study

Ireland needs to call time on alcohol marketing and sports sponsorship

Admirable ends, ineffective means: comments on the alcohol harm reduction strategy for England

Doctors can't fix the alcohol problem by themselves

Perceived determinants to alcohol consumption and misuse: a survey of university students

Public and professional stakeholders' perceptions of alcohol advertising and availability policies: A qualitative study

Industry's pledges to limit harms of alcohol are unlikely to work, research finds.

Alcohol: no ordinary commodity: research and public policy

The Perils of Partnership: Interactions Between Public Health England, Drinkaware, and the Portman Group Surrounding the Drink Free Days Campaign