A review of superconducting fault current limiters compared with other proven technologies
Guilherme Gonçalves Sotelo,Gabriel dos Santos,Felipe Sass,Bruno Wanderley França,Daniel Henrique Nogueira Dias,Marcio Zamboti Fortes,Alexander Polasek,Rubens de Andrade Jr.,Guilherme Gonçalves Sotelo,Gabriel dos Santos,Felipe Sass,Bruno Wanderley França,Daniel Henrique Nogueira Dias,Marcio Zamboti Fortes,Alexander Polasek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supcon.2022.100018
2022-09-01
Superconductivity
Abstract:Several substations in operation were commissioned decades ago. These substations are overstressed, then their protection equipment cannot provide an effective safety condition to the system. In the worst cases, short-circuits can cause permanent damage to the system if the overcurrent is higher than the capacity of the installed equipment. There are some possible solutions for those cases: replace all the equipment in the overstressed substation, build a new one in parallel or install a fault current limiter (FCL) device. From an economic point of view, introducing FCLs in the power system is the best way to solve the described problem. The commercial solutions available are the pyrotechnic FCL, air coil reactor, neutral earthing resistor, and high impedance transformer. However, these devices are limited and present several drawbacks. Since the ’70s, there has been a search for reliable FCL devices that do not interfere in the regular operation of substations and could limit the fault currents to the protection system rated level. There were so many FCL technologies proposed in the last decades. These proposed new devices may use superconducting technologies, power electronics, or both. This paper reviews proven FCL technologies, focusing on full-scale devices demonstrated in field and lab tests. The goal is to introduce the main FCL technologies in development and discuss didactically their operation principle, the built prototypes, the commercial units, whether they exist, and the main drawbacks for each technology presented. A final analysis of the level of maturity for each FCL technology is discussed using the TRL (Technology readiness level) scale in order to find technologies with more potential for mass production. The three technologies closer to the full commercial application are: the Resistive Superconducting FCL, the Saturated Iron Core FCL, and the Series Reactor FCL.