Abstract:Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea is the periodic reduction (hypopnoea) or cessation (apnoea) of breathing due to narrowing or occlusion of the upper airway during sleep. The main symptom is daytime sleepiness and it has been suggested it is linked to premature death, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, stroke and road traffic accidents. Objectives: The main treatment for sleep apnoea is with the use of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP), which requires a flow generator and mask. These are used at night to prevent apnoea, hypoxia and sleep disturbance. The objective was to assess the effects of CPAP in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register and reference lists of articles. We consulted experts in the field. Searches were current to July 2005. Selection criteria: We included randomised trials comparing nocturnal CPAP with an inactive control or oral appliances in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea (an apnoea and hypopnoea index greater than five per hour). Trials had a minimum intervention period of two weeks. Data collection and analysis: Trial quality was assessed and two review authors extracted data independently. Study authors were contacted for missing information. Parallel and crossover group trials were analysed separately. Main results: Thirty-six trials involving 1718 people met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was mixed. Compared with control, CPAP showed significant improvements in objective and subjective sleepiness and several quality of life, cognitive function and depression measures (parallel-group studies: Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) -3.83 units, 95% CI -4.57 to -3.09; crossover studies: ESS -1.84 units, 95% CI -2.57 to -1.11). Twenty-four hour systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with CPAP compared with control (parallel-group trials). Compared with oral appliances, CPAP significantly reduced the apnoea and hypopnoea index (crossover studies: -7.97 events/hr, 95% CI -9.56 to -6.38) and improved sleep efficiency (crossover studies: 2.31%, 95% CI 0.02 to 4.6) and minimum oxygen saturation (4.14%, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.03). Responders to both treatments expressed a strong preference for the oral appliance. However, participants were more likely to withdraw on OA than on CPAP therapy. Authors' conclusions: CPAP is effective in reducing symptoms of sleepiness and improving quality of life measures in people with moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). It is more effective than oral appliances in reducing respiratory disturbances in these people but subjective outcomes are more equivocal. Certain people tend to prefer oral appliances to CPAP where both are effective. This could be because they offer a more convenient way of controlling OSA. Short-term data indicate that CPAP leads to lower blood pressure than in controls. Long-term data are required for all outcomes in order to determine whether the initial benefits seen in short-term clinical trials persist.

Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea

Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea

Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults

[Efficacy of Simple Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea].

Effect on Quality of Life of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Meta-analysis

The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of CPAP and mandibular advancement device treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised study of three non-surgical treatments in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea

Impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)

Continuous positive airway pressure for treating high blood pressure of patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome：a meta-analysis

E ectiveness of Oral Appliance versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Treating Patients with Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

Long-term effects on clinical event, mental health, and related outcomes of CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review

Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients in subjective outcomes of sleepiness behavior and mood status

Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cognitive functions in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Continuous positive airway pressure does not reduce blood pressure in nonsleepy hypertensive OSA patients

Does Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Benefit Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea? A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

[Impact of Long-Term Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome].

Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Does Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Benefit Patients With Coronary Artery Disease And Obstructive Sleep Apnea? A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on elderly patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis.