Abstract:We extended our detection model of achromatic spatial vision (Rovamo, J., Mustonen, J., & Näsänen, R. (1994a). Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area. Vision Research, 34, 1301-1314) to colour vision by taking into account the fact that due to the spatio-chromatic opponency of retinal ganglion cells and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) neurons, equiluminous chromatic gratings are not affected by precortical lateral inhibition. We then tested the extended model by using Mullen's experimental data (Mullen, K. J. (1985). The contrast sensitivity of human color vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. Journal of Physiology, 359, 381-400). The band-pass shape of the spatial contrast sensitivity function for luminance-modulated green and yellow gratings transformed to a low-pass shape, resembling the chromatic spatial contrast sensitivity function for red-green and blue-yellow equiluminous gratings, when the effect of precortical lateral inhibition on grating contrast was computationally removed by dividing luminance contrast sensitivities by spatial frequency (i.e. by af, where a = 1 degree). After the removal of this direct effect of lateral inhibition, there still remained a residual shape difference between the spatial contrast sensitivity functions for chromatic and luminance gratings. It was due to indirect reduction of grating visibility by quantal noise high-pass filtered by precortical lateral inhibition. When this indirect effect of quantal noise was also removed, contrast sensitivity for luminance gratings was about twice the sensitivity for chromatic gratings at all spatial frequencies. This was evidently due to the fact that the chromatic contrast of the equiluminous grating at the opponent stage (Cole, G. R., Hine, T. & McIihagga, W. (1993). Detection mechanisms in L-, M-, and S-cone contrast space. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 38-51) was about half of the luminance contrast of either of its chromatic component. Thus, if the contrast of the equiluminous chromatic grating were not expressed as the Michelson contrast of one chromatic component grating against its own background (Mullen, K. J. (1985). The contrast sensitivity of human color vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. Journal of Physiology, 359, 381-400) but as chromatic contrast at the opponent stage, contrast sensitivity would be the same for chromatic and luminance gratings.

Luminance spatial frequency differences facilitate the segmentation of superimposed textures

Texture variations suppress suprathreshold brightness and colour variations

Summation of texture segregation across orientation and spatial frequency: electrophysiological and psychophysical findings

Dipper Functions for Second-Order Modulation of Contrast, Orientation, and Motion

Discrimination of Complex Patterns: Orientation Information is Integrated across Spatial Scale; Spatial-Frequency and Contrast Information are Not

Higher order texture statistics impair contrast boundary segmentation

Luminance texture boundaries and luminance step boundaries are segmented using different mechanisms

The interpretation of visual motion: evidence for surface segmentation mechanisms

Texture brightness filling-in

The Perceived Spatial Frequency, Contrast, and Orientation of Illusory Gratings

Multichannel Texture Segmentation Using Talbot Effect

Texture segmentation using Gabor modulation/demodulation

The lowest spatial frequency channel determines brightness perception

Coarse-to-fine Encoding of Spatial Frequency Information into Visual Short-Term Memory for Faces but Impartial Decay.

The use of chromatic information for motion segmentation: differences between psychophysical and eye-movement measures

Opposing dorsal/ventral stream dynamics during figure-ground segregation

Interdependences between finger movement direction and haptic perception of oriented textures

Modelling spatial contrast sensitivity functions for chromatic and luminance-modulated gratings

A two-photon imaging study on the roles of macaque V1 and V4 in texture segregation

Relative contributions of 2D and 3D cues in a texture segmentation task, implications for the roles of striate and extrastriate cortex in attentional selection.

Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence of independent facilitation by collinearity and similarity in texture grouping and segmentation.