Abstract:Purpose: Single-isocenter linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a promising treatment technique for the management of multiple brain metastases. Because of the high prescription dose and steep dose gradient, SRS plans are sensitive to geometric errors, resulting in loss of target coverage and suboptimal local tumor control. Current planning techniques rely on adding a uniform and isotropic setup margin to all gross tumor volumes (GTVs) to account for rotational uncertainties. However, this setup margin may be insufficient, since the magnitude of rotational uncertainties varies and is dependent upon the distance between a GTV and the isocenter. In this study, we designed a framework to determine the optimal isocenter of a single-isocenter SRS plan for multiple brain metastases using stochastic optimization to mitigate potential errors resulting from rotational uncertainties. Methods: Planning target volumes (PTVs), defined as GTVs plus a 1-mm margin following common SRS planning convention, were assumed to be originally treated with a prescription dose and therefore covered by the prescription isodose cloud. The dose distribution, including the prescription isodose, was considered invariant assuming small rotations throughout the study. A stochastic optimization scheme was developed to determine the location of the optimal isocenter, so that the prescription dose coverage of rotated GTVs, equivalent to the intersecting volumes between the rotated GTVs and original PTVs, was maximized for any random small rotations about the isocenter. To evaluate the coverage of GTVs, the expected V 100 % undergoing random rotations was approximated as the sample average V 100 % undergoing a predetermined number of rotations. The expected V 100 % of each individual GTV and total GTVs was then compared between the plans using the optimal isocenter and the center-of-mass (CoM), respectively. Results: Twenty-two patients previously treated for multiple brain metastases in a single institute were included in this retrospective study. Each patient was initially treated for more than three brain metastases (mean: 7.6; range: 3-15) with the average GTV volume of 0.89 cc (range: 0.03-11.78 cc). The optimal isocenter found for each patient was significantly different from the CoM, with the average Euclidean distance between the optimal isocenter and the CoM being 4.36 ± 2.59 cm. The dose coverage to GTVs was also significantly improved (paired t-test; p < 0.001) when the optimal isocenter was used, with the average V 100 % of total GTVs increasing from 87.1% (standard deviation as std: 11.7%; range: 39.9-98.2%) to 94.2% (std: 5.4%; range: 77.7-99.4%). The volume of a GTV was positively correlated with the expected V 100 % regardless of the isocenter used (Spearman coefficient: ρ = 0.66 ; p < 0.001). The distance between a GTV and the isocenter was negatively correlated with the expected V 100 % when the CoM was used ( ρ = - 0.21 ; p = 0.004), however no significant correlation was found when the optimal isocenter was used ( ρ = - 0.11 ; p = 0.137). Conclusion: The proposed framework provides an effective approach to determine the optimal isocenter of single-isocenter LINAC-based SRS plans for multiple brain metastases. The implementation of the optimal isocenter results in SRS plans with consistently higher target coverage despite potential rotational uncertainties, and therefore significantly improves SRS plan robustness against random rotational uncertainties.

What is the optimal isodose line for stereotactic radiotherapy for single brain metastases using HyperArc?

Effect of prescription isodose line on tissue sparing in linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery treating multiple brain metastases using dynamic conformal arcs

Impact of Multileaf Collimator Width on Dose Distribution in HyperArc Fractionated Stereotactic Irradiation for Multiple (-) Brain Metastases

Optimization of treatment isocenter location in single-isocenter LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for management of multiple brain metastases

An Extremely Inhomogeneous Gross Tumor Dose is Suitable for Volumetric Modulated Arc-Based Radiosurgery with a 5-mm Leaf-Width Multileaf Collimator for Single Brain Metastasis

Consideration of Optimal Evaluation Metrics for Internal Gross Tumor Dose Relevant to Tumor Response in Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis

Optimization of Isocenter Position for Multiple Brain Metastases Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Minimize Dosimetric Variations Due to Rotational Uncertainty.

Is Real-Time Inverse Planning Optimizing Dose to the Normal Brain? A Prospective Comparative Trial in a Series of Brain Metastases Treated by Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Dosimetric Comparisons of Different Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Techniques in Treating Intracranial Tumors > 3 Cm in Longest Diameter

Dosimetric comparison of HyperArc and InCise MLC‐based CyberKnife plans in treating single and multiple brain metastases

Benefit of dosimetry distribution for patients with multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer by a Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system

Dosimetric Comparison, Treatment Efficiency Estimation, and Biological Evaluation of Popular Stereotactic Radiosurgery Options in Treating Single Small Brain Metastasis

Geometric and dosimetric consequences of intra-fractional movement in single isocenter non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery

Multifraction stereotactic radiotherapy utilizing inhomogeneous dose distribution for brainstem metastases: a single-center retrospective analysis

Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.

Dose conformity and falloff in single‐lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods

1134 A Call to Revise the Thirty-year-old SRS Dose Guidelines for Brain Metastases

Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans

Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for Patients With 10 to 30 Brain Metastases: A Dosimetric Analysis

Retrospective Quality Metrics Review of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans Treating Multiple Targets Using Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison with Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.