Abstract:Applying both theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence, we address 2 key questions regarding shared decision making (SDM): 1) When should SDM be more patient driven, and when should it be more provider driven? and 2) Should health care providers match their SDM style/strategy to patient needs and preferences? Self-determination theory, for example, posits a distinction between autonomy and independence. A patient may autonomously seek their health care provider's input and guidance, perhaps due to low perceived competence, low coping resources, or high emotional arousal. Given their need state, they may autonomously require nonindependence. In this case, it may be more patient centered and need supportive to provide more provider-driven care. We discuss how other patient characteristics such as personality attributes, motivational state, and the course of illness and other parameters such as time available for an encounter may inform optimal provider decision-making style and strategy. We conclude that for some types of patients and clinical circumstances, a more provider-driven approach to decision making may be more practical, ethical, and efficacious. Thus, while all decision making should be patient centered (i.e., it should consider patient needs and preferences), it does not always have to be patient driven. We propose a flexible model of SDM whereby practitioners are encouraged to tailor their decision making behaviors to patient needs, preferences, and other attributes. Studies are needed to test whether matching decision-making behavior based on patient states and traits (i.e., achieving concordance) is more effective than simply providing all patients with the same type of decision making, which could be tested using matching/mismatching designs.

Ethical decision-making made easier. The use of decision trees in case management

Enabling Decision-Making with the Modified Causal Forest: Policy Trees for Treatment Assignment

Narrative analysis of the ethics in providing advance care planning

Continuing Education in Ethical Decision Making Using Case Studies From Medical Social Work

[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine]

Algorithms for Ethical Decision-Making in the Clinic: A Proof of Concept

The politics of end-of-life decision-making: computerised decision-support tools, physicians' jurisdiction and morality

A model for boundary dilemmas: ethical decision-making in the patient-professional relationship

Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom

Development and Implementation of Clinical Decision Algorithms for Oncology

The Counseling, Self-Care, Adherence Approach to Person-Centered Care and Shared Decision Making: Moral Psychology, Executive Autonomy, and Ethics in Multi-Dimensional Care Decisions

Assessing and Balancing Elder Risk, Safety and Autonomy: Decision-Making Practices of Health Care Professionals

How Behavior Analysts Make Ethical Decisions: A Qualitative Study

Good Things Come in Trees: Emotion and Context Aware Behaviour Trees for Ethical Robotic Decision-Making

Complex Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care: A Discussion Paper and Suggested Model

A Decision-Theoretic Model for Using Scientific Data

Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise

Decision-Making in People With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review of Decision-Making Tools

Validating care and treatment scenarios for measuring decisional conflict regarding future care preferences among older adults

Decision-making Capacity: the Core of Self-Neglect.

Moral dialogue: An interactional approach to ethical decision making