New Shock Detector for Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction

Chaoqun Liu,Maria Oliveira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11842-5_9

2009-08-10

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

[Ancient Indian and Chinese medical oaths and the comparison of their medical rules]

S Aksoy

Abstract:The art of medicine has existed on earth since the existence of mankind. Although the traditions and practices may vary, the mere intention has been to help people remain healthy and restore their health when they get sick. Since health is man's most important fortune, the medical profession has always been open to abuse or misuse. To prevent this, it came to be a tradition to bound health care professionals with oaths and codes. This article examines medical oaths and codes in two different Eastern traditions, namely China and India. Two different medical oaths from two major ancient Indian medical books, Charaka Samhita and Susuruta will be addressed and elaborated. They will be compared and contrasted with each other and their commons and differences from the other medical oaths will be examined. Chinese medical codes, one from the 7th and the other from the 17th century are reviewed in the article. It has appeared from the discussion that although there are some 'unchangeables' in the codes and oaths, like the reference to some sacred or transcendental being or commitment to show respect to the teachers, there are differences due to the time and place. It is also interesting to note how medical practice and its values are influenced by the respective society.
The Hippocratic Oath across the interfaith spectrum

Jonathan Kopel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2021.1993113

2021-11-03

Abstract:Almost every medical school's graduation ceremony includes some sort of professional medical oath. The Hippocratic Oath, written over 2400 years ago, is the oldest and most well-known of these vows. The essential components of modern medical ethics-beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice-outlined in the Hippocratic Oath persist to this day. The substance of the Hippocratic Oath has been altered and its authorship questioned, yet the major world religions, Baha'i, Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, Jainism, Judaism, Shinto, Sikhism, Taoism, and Zoroastrianism, had versions of the Hippocratic Oath to emphasize the importance of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice for newly initiated physicians. By investigating these alternative versions of the Hippocratic Oath, similarities between different faiths emerge, reinforcing a common thread of humanity that spans across time.
The Hippocratic Oath: Analysis and Contemporary Meaning.

A. Mavrogenis,Pantelis Limneos,Spyros Sioutis,T. Saranteas,Lampros Reppas,Achilles Bekos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20210819-08

2021-09-01

Orthopedics

Abstract:The Hippocratic oath is traditionally taken by medical school graduates at the time of their graduation, either in its original form or in a modern variation. It is considered the earliest expression of medical ethics, establishing principles of ethics that remain of paramount significance today. However, it was written in antiquity, whereas medicine has been constantly evolving. This article reviews, analyzes, and interprets each section of the oath to determine to what extent it remains relevant to contemporary medicine. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(5):264-272.].

History,Medicine
Cause of abdominal pain in a 4-year old boy with cystic fibrosis.

C. Taylor,N. Aswani

IF: 5.526

2002-03-01

Paediatric Respiratory Reviews

Abstract:
Understanding the modern relevance of the Hippocratic Oath

L. Marcucci,D. Fourel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2024.101005

2024-01-01

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health

Abstract:The Hippocratic Oath is a composite text that dates back thousands of years and has been rewritten many times. This text is still a key reference, both from a deontological point of view (because of the principles it promotes and the professional morality it defends) and from an ethical point of view (based on the precepts of the ancients, concerning the ethos of practitioners and the doctor-patient relationship). All medical doctors in France pronounce it at least once in their professional life, at the end of their PhD defense. Nevertheless, this text and this moment are sometimes judged to be outmoded or even outdated. Based on a philosophical methodology, paying attention to the contribution of human sciences, the aim of this article is to highlight how the Hippocratic Oath still enlightens us today, in the current context of paradigm shifts (the doctor-patient relationship, model of co-decision; contractualization; market logic, etc.) and multiple crises (health crises, resource constraints, wars, etc.). The result of this survey is that while medicine is both an art and a science the Oath does however, emphasize the humanist dimension of daily practice. That's why reading and pronouncing the Hippocratic Oath implies taking an interest not only in understanding its deeper meaning and spirit beyond the letter of the text, but also in what we wish to pass on to future generations in terms of key ethical references.
Prostate cancer (non-metastatic).

T. Wilt

Abstract:
The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times

Helen Askitopoulou,Antoniοs N. Vgontzas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4

IF: 2.721

2017-10-27

European Spine Journal

Abstract:The present paper discusses the relevance and significance of the Hippocratic Oath to contemporary medical ethical and moral values. It attempts to answer the questions about some controversial issues related to the Oath. The text is divided in two parts. Part I discusses the general attributes and ethical values of the Oath, while Part II presents a detailed analysis of each passage of the Oath with regard to perennial ethical principles and moral values. Part I starts with the contribution of Hippocrates and his School of Cos to medicine. It continues by examining the moral dilemmas concerning physicians and patients in the Classical Times and in the Modern World. It also investigates how the Hippocratic Oath stands nowadays, with regard to the remarkable and often revolutionary advancements in medical practice and the significant evolution in medical ethics. Further, it presents the debate and the criticism about the relevance of the general attributes and ethical values of the Oath to those of modern societies. Finally, it discusses the endurance of the ethical values of the Hippocratic Oath over the centuries until today with respect to the physicians’ commitment to the practice of patient-oriented medicine. Part I concludes with the Oath’s historic input in the Judgment delivered at the close of the Nuremberg “Doctors’ Trial”; this Judgement has become legally binding for the discipline in the Western World and was the basis of the Nuremberg Code. The ethical code of the Oath turned out to be a fundamental part of western law not only on medical ethics but also on patients’ rights regarding research.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
["Refusal to treat under six conditions", the earliest medical and ethical code in ancient China]

D Zang

Abstract:In the paper the principle of physician's "Refusal to treat under six cases" was reviewed. It was the first ethical code for physician in ancient China. The emergence of ethical code for physician was the result of medical professionalism and the formation of the professional groups. The principle proposed by the famous physician Bian-Que in ancient China, like Hippocratic Oath, was an ethics of outer achievement rather than one of inner intention. It provided a framework of medical behavior, and emerges as a powerful tool seeking to safeguard the reputation of the profession for its own sake rather than, in main, seeking to promote the patients' good.
[Hippocratic philosophy]

R Cruz-Coke

Abstract:The art of medicine was formed in Greece in close relationship to culture and philosophy. During the Christian era, it was projected through the Corpus Hippocraticus, in several ethical and philosophical documents such as The Oath of Medical Science, Medical Law, Decency, Precepts, Antique Medicine, Airs and Aphorisms, Waters and places. The central idea of Hippocratic philosophy is the principle of wholeness, summarized by Plato in the sentence "The certain knowledge of nature is solely possible from medicine and only when it is correctly approached as a whole". Clinical actions, are imbued by Hippocratic ethics; their aim is the ill that is an anthropos, a human being. The physician must take care of the ill with devotion, selflessness, comprehension and compassion. The oath is the supreme deontological code that summarizes the essential concepts of Hippocratic philosophy. Recent studies suggest that there is a great distance between the thinking of Hippocrates and present scientific medicine. Hippocratic philosophy rejects the epistemological principles of modern science. The Hippocratic logic is probabilistic and temporal and rejects the principles of noncontradiction, of identity and therefore the abstract determinism of contemporary science. The present force of the oath is explained because its ethics and epistemology are matters of medicine that understands the real world of the ill, trying to avoid suffering and injustice. Only Hippocrates can defend each ill as a whole with the wisdom of its philosophy.
The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective

Helen Askitopoulou,Antonis N. Vgontzas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5615-z

IF: 2.721

2018-05-21

European Spine Journal

Abstract:This is the second part of a paper on the relevance and significance of the Hippocratic Oath to modern medical ethical and moral values with the aim at answering questions on controversial issues related to the Oath. Part I argued that the general attributes and ethical values of the Oath are relevant to the modern world. Part II attempts to elucidate the interpretation of the specific injunctions of the Oath from today’s perspective in relation to ethical values concerning the duties of physicians to patients and society. The objective is to prove that the Oath has established the general context of medical ethics of the physician–patient relationship, which reflects long-lasting moral values that still define the medical profession. The Oath has exemplified the fundamental modern ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and confidentiality. Its foremost message focuses on patients’ best interests and not on the prohibition of surgery, euthanasia or abortion, as is generally believed. Furthermore, the Oath as a code of professional identity has had a powerful impact on modem judicial opinions regarding medical ethics. In a lot of ways, it is as relevant of the values of contemporary medicine as it was for ancient medicine.Graphical abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Relevance of the Hippocratic Oath today

Artur Bjelica

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/mpns1902005b

2019-01-01

Medical Review

Abstract:A selection of writings on the Hippocratic Oath, with a variety of opinions, has been critically reviewed. The aim of this article was a comparative analysis of the contents of the two most widely known versions of the Oath, namely ?Classic Version? - Edelstein?s translation from Greek to English, and ?Modern Version? - Lasagna?s modification of the former version. Some attention has also been paid to several texts composed in a similar vein to the Hippocratic Oath. This short review of the pertinent literature shows that opinions about its relevance range from warm approval to total disapproval. A number of pros and cons were discussed, and our own preferences were clearly stated. The fact that the tradition, in which graduate medical students take some version of the Hippocratic Oath, is nurtured at (almost) all medical schools over the world supports an affirmative answer to the question posed in the title of the article.
The Hippocratic Oath and the Declaration of Geneva: legitimisation attempts of professional conduct

Urban Wiesing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09910-w

2019-06-13

Abstract:The Hippocratic Oath and the Declaration of Geneva of the World Medical Association are compared in terms of content and origin. Their relevance for current medical practice is investigated. The status which is ascribed to these documents will be shown and the status which they can reasonably claim to have will be explored. Arguments in favor of the Hippocratic Oath that rely on historical stability or historical origin are being examined. It is demonstrated that they get caught up in paradoxes. Should doctors swear the Hippocratic Oath or the Declaration of Geneva? The Hippocratic Oath is a remarkable historic document, which contains important elements still relevant for medical ethics today. Its interpretation as a timeless, still valid medical code is unfounded. The historical arguments, that should justify its validity, are untenable. The Declaration of Geneva, and not the Hippocratic Oath, can legitimately claim to come close to representing the most important principles of professional medical conduct in today's globalised world.

ethics,history & philosophy of science
The Hippocratic principle "to help or at least to do no harm"

Helen Askitopoulou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2024.06.002

Abstract:Hippocrates' teaching on the ethical and moral values of medicine have captivated physicians, scholars, and historians for over twenty-five centuries, enduring despite the challenges of applying moral guidance across diverse cultures. At the core of Hippocratic ethics is the human relationship between the physician and the patient, with an emphasis on the physician's responsibility to assess potential harm involved in any attempt to heal. The Hippocratic principle "to help, or at least to do no harm" remains as relevant today as it was 2,500 years ago. In the modern context, it serves as a deontological imperative, reminding physicians to evaluate the risks of harm associated with any healing attempt. This concept aligns with the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, which are at the heart of Hippocratic medical ethics with timeless significance.
Updating the Hippocratic Oath to include medicine's social contract

Richard Cruess,Sylvia Cruess

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12277

Abstract:Context: It is widely understood that reciting a contemporary version of the Hippocratic Oath has two purposes. It constitutes a public commitment on the part of the prospective doctor to preserving the traditional values of the medical profession and to meeting the obligations expected of a doctor. It is also an important symbolic ritual in the process of professional identity formation. Methods: A portion of the 1964 version of the Hippocratic Oath is examined for its relevance to the current practice of medicine. Its closing paragraph reads: 'If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, be respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.' This is interpreted as representing the doctor's expectations of the practice of medicine: job satisfaction; status, and prestige. It also conveys the understanding that enjoying these benefits is contingent upon the doctor's adherence to the terms of the Oath. Conclusions: Our current understanding of the relationship between medicine and society is that a social contract exists under which members of the profession are granted a privileged position in society on the understanding that they will meet society's reasonable expectations. These expectations entail obligations not only to patients and to the profession, but to wider society. The Oath under consideration, which concentrates on medicine's obligations to patients and to the profession, does not adequately reflect its obligations to society. It is suggested that versions of the Hippocratic Oath used in the future should be updated to better reflect the obligations of both individual doctors and the medical profession to society.
Prevalence of intestinal parasites in domestic cats from the London area

S. Nichol,S. J. Ball,K. Snow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/VR.109.12.252

1981-09-19

Abstract:The prevalence of intestinal parasites in domestic cats from the London area was surveyed over an 18-month period by microscopic examination of faecal samples. Of the 947 cats examined 11.5 per cent were infected with Toxocara cati, 1.9 per cent with Isospora felis, 1.2 per cent with Dipylidium caninum, 1.2 per cent with Taenia taeniaeformis, 0.8 per cent with I rivolta and 0.2 per cent with Toxascaris leonina.
Thoughts and strategies on ethical issues in clinical research of surgery

Lijie Tan,Ziyu Li,Yan Zhang,Jizhou Wang,Lianxin Liu,Jianming Wang,Yun Lu,Chaoqun Ma,Surong Hua,Wenming Wu,Yupei Zhao,Hongwei Yao,Jingjing He,Yuanyuan Kong,Zhongtao Zhang,Ziwen Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2019.01.013

2019-01-01

Abstract:Medical ethics has a long history and rich connotations. It has developed from the simple morality of ancient times to the modern medical ethics. The basic principles of medical ethics include autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice, and so on. Researchers often conduct clini-cal researches in the balance between achievements and ethical norms. Clinical researchers of surgery should have a deep understanding of medical ethical principles and strictly abide by medical ethics. Ethics committee should strictly perform their duties and play the role of inspection and supervision. Modern medical knowledges should be popularized throughout the society to make clinical research correctly understood. Adhering principles of ethics first, people orientation and cooperation practice, with patients′ benefit as evaluation criteria, balance of surgical Dao and Shu can be achieved. Key words: Clinical research; Surgery; Ethics; Bioethics; Decision
Chinese Confucian culture and the medical ethical tradition.

Z Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.4.239

1995-08-01

Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract:The Confucian culture, rich in its contents and great in its significance, exerted on the thinking, culture and political life of ancient China immense influences, unparalleled by any other school of thought or culture. Confucian theories on morality and ethics, with 'goodness' as the core and 'rites' as the norm, served as the 'key notes' of the traditional medical ethics of China. The viewpoints of Confucianism on benevolence and material interests, on good and evil, on kindheartedness, and on character cultivation were all inherited by the medical workers and thus became prominent in Chinese traditional medical ethics. Hence, it is clear that the medical profession and Confucianism have long shared common goals in terms of ethics. Influenced by the excellent Confucian thinking and culture, a rather highly-developed system of Chinese traditional medical ethics emerged with a well-defined basic content, and the system has been followed and amended by medical professionals of all generations throughout Chinese history. This system, just to mention briefly, contains concepts such as the need: to attach great importance to the value of life; to do one's best to rescue the dying and to heal the wounded; to show concern to those who suffer from diseases; to practise medicine with honesty; to study medical skills painstakingly; to oppose a careless style of work; to comfort oneself in a dignified manner; to respect local customs and to be polite; to treat patients, noble or humble, equally, and to respect the academic achievements of others, etc. Of course, at the same time, Confucian culture has its own historical and class limitations, which exerted negative influences on traditional medical ethics. Now, if we are to keep up with the development of modern medicine, a serious topic must be addressed. That is how to retain the essence of our traditional medical ethics so as to maintain historic continuity and yet, at the same time, add on the new contents of medical ethics so as to incorporate modern features into our system. Therefore, when trying to reform medical practice in China, we are faced with the urgent need to inherit and promulgate the essence of Confucian ethics--discarding its obsolete concepts--while at the same time building up the new medical ethics that can meet the requirements of the outside world and the future.

ethics,medical ethics,social issues,social sciences, biomedical
Contemporary Medical Students’ Perceptions of the Hippocratic Oath

Fritz Baumgartner,Gabriel Flores

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363918756389

2018-02-01

The Linacre Quarterly

Abstract:Background: The Hippocratic Oath is a standard of medical ethics. Oath adaptations are common. Objective: Evaluate students’ perceptions regarding the oath. Design: Survey of University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical School graduating students regarding the oath’s relevance, content, and application, and whether a choice of version should be provided. Results: Forty-two of the fifty-three students (79 percent) considered the original oath relevant. Most (53 percent) disagreed that the oath in its original form be used, and most preferred a modified oath. More agreed (40 percent) than disagreed (28 percent) on providing a choice of version of the oath. The mean of correct answers as to the original oath’s contents was 68 percent. Euthanasia and abortion prohibitions were recognized by 68 percent and 62 percent, respectively. Increased knowledge of the original’s contents correlated with decreased desire that it be used ( p = .02). Recognition of euthanasia/abortion prohibitions was significantly better for those in disagreement than in agreement that the original be used. Those who disagreed that a choice of oath versions be provided had significantly better knowledge of the original’s euthanasia/abortion prohibitions than those who agreed. However, those who felt strongly that a choice should or should not be given each had a 100 percent accuracy of identifying euthanasia/abortion prohibitions. Conclusions: Most students preferred an adapted oath to the original. Increased student knowledge of the original oath’s contents, including reference to euthanasia/abortion, significantly correlated with decreased desire to use it. Given the original’s importance in medical ethics, this is concerning. A subset of students, however, affirmed the original’s value and desired its use. Improved education in the Hippocratic oath is important, given modern medicine’s complex moral issues. Summary: The Hippocratic oath is a standard of medical ethics. Oath adaptations eliminating the original’s prohibitions of abortion/euthanasia are common. Most medical students who were questioned preferred the adapted oath to the original. Only two-thirds recognized the original’s prohibitions of abortion/euthanasia. Those who knew of the original oath’s prohibitions also had a decreased desire that it be used. Students disagreeing that a choice of versions of the oath be provided had better knowledge of these prohibitions. This is concerning, given the original oath’s importance in medical ethics including at the 1945–1949 Nuremberg trials. Nonetheless, a subset of students affirmed the original Hippocratic oath’s importance, desiring its use.
[The Hippocratic heritage about moral duty in Arabic medicine]

J Habbi

Abstract:The Hippocratic heritage in the Arabic tradition is very rich. We have three different texts about medical moral obligations: an Oath, called 'Ahd or Qasam, which is quite similar to the Greek one; a law, called Nāmūs, and a Commandment or Will, called wasiyyah, which is probably a pseudo-hippocratic writing. In this article the author explains the functions, the usage and the necessity of the three different texts, using the Arab historiographical tradition to find the real reason for the existence of the different formulas. At the end of the article the author supplies a translation of the three texts from Arabic to Italian.
A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health

Bertalan Meskó,Brennan Spiegel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/39177

2022-09-07

Abstract:Physicians have been taking the Hippocratic Oath for centuries. The Oath contains a set of ethical rules designed to guide physicians through their profession; it articulates a set of true north principles that govern the practice of medicine. The Hippocratic Oath has undergone several revisions, most notably in 1948 by the World Medical Association. However, in an era of rapid change in medicine, we believe it is time to update the Oath with modest but meaningful additions so that it optimally reflects 21st century health care. The rise of digital health has dramatically changed the practice of medicine in a way that could not have been easily predicted at the time Hippocrates outlined his ethical principles of medicine. Digital health is a broad term that encompasses use of digital devices and platforms, including electronic health records, patient-provider portals, mobile health apps, wearable biosensors, artificial intelligence, social media platforms, and medical extended reality, to improve the process and outcomes of health care delivery. These technologies have driven a cultural transformation in the delivery of care. We offer modest suggestions to help prompt discussion and contemplation about the current Oath and its relevancy to our changing times. Our suggestions are not meant to be a definitive set of final recommendations. Rather, we propose new text that bodies such as the World Medical Association might consider integrating into an updated Oath, just as previous changes were adopted to ensure the Oath remains relevant and impactful for all physicians and their patients.

New Shock Detector for Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction

[Ancient Indian and Chinese medical oaths and the comparison of their medical rules]

The Hippocratic Oath across the interfaith spectrum

The Hippocratic Oath: Analysis and Contemporary Meaning.

Cause of abdominal pain in a 4-year old boy with cystic fibrosis.

Understanding the modern relevance of the Hippocratic Oath

Prostate cancer (non-metastatic).

The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times

["Refusal to treat under six conditions", the earliest medical and ethical code in ancient China]

[Hippocratic philosophy]

The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective

Relevance of the Hippocratic Oath today

The Hippocratic Oath and the Declaration of Geneva: legitimisation attempts of professional conduct

The Hippocratic principle "to help or at least to do no harm"

Updating the Hippocratic Oath to include medicine's social contract

Prevalence of intestinal parasites in domestic cats from the London area

Thoughts and strategies on ethical issues in clinical research of surgery

Chinese Confucian culture and the medical ethical tradition.

Contemporary Medical Students’ Perceptions of the Hippocratic Oath

[The Hippocratic heritage about moral duty in Arabic medicine]

A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health