Abstract:Background: COVID-19 has posed severe challenges to crisis management in democracies. Different democracies respond to the crisis differently. This article proposes an analytical framework to explain why democracies respond differently to the public health crisis and how different contextual factors affect crisis response in democracies. Methods: By comparing COVID-19 responses in the US and South Korea, this article conducts a comparative case study with a most similar system design. The two countries have been selected as cases because they are both developed democracies with a robust healthcare system. However, different contextual factors in the two countries have created different crisis responses by shaping different crisis leadership and political and social solidarity. This study collected data from different sources, including government documents, official websites, leaders' speeches, research reports, academic articles and news media. We tried to enhance the reliability of the data by comparing different data sources. Results: We found that individual, institutional and cultural dimensions of contextual factors can influence different crisis responses of democratic countries by shaping crisis leadership and political and social solidarity. On the individual and institutional dimensions, leadership style and governance structure shape crisis leadership (sense making, decision making and coordinating, and meaning making), which in turn influences crisis management. On the cultural dimension, political and social solidarity measured by political polarization and social cooperation are shaped by cultural and social norms. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that democracies require strong crisis leadership and a high degree of political and social solidarity to tackle public health crises. A centralized and coordinated system, as well as a political elite leadership style shaped by rich crisis response experience, expertise and high sensitivity to crises are conducive to crisis management. Fostering a cultural and social norm that facilitates state–society collaboration can promote crisis management. These findings provide valuable insights for decision-makers to effectively respond to future pandemics.

Challenges of Collaborative Government Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of Factors and Cases in the United States

Public Value and Ethical Challenges in the COVID-19 Pandemic Response

Collaboration in Handling COVID-19 Turbulence from a Threefold Perspective: A Literature Review

Collaborative Neighborhood Governance and Its Effectiveness in Community Mitigation to COVID-19 Pandemic: from the Perspective of Community Workers in Six Chinese Cities

Combating COVID-19 Together: China’s Collaborative Response and the Role of Business Associations

Six Cs of pandemic emergency management: A case study of Taiwan's initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Assessing Emergency Information Sharing between the Government and the Public during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Open Government Perspective

A Comparative Analysis of Government Responses to COVID-19 in the United States, China, and South Korea: Lessons from the Early Stage of the Pandemic

Combating COVID-19 Through Collaborative Governance: Lessons from East Asia

The challenges of data usage for the United States' COVID-19 response

Collaborating in the Time of COVID-19: The Scope and Scale of Innovative Responses to a Global Pandemic

Joining Hands to Manage Transboundary Crises: A Comparative Evaluation of Policy Collaboration for Epidemic Prevention in China during SARS and COVID-19

Integrating Government Silos: Local Emergency Management and Public Health Department Collaboration for Emergency Planning and Response

Understanding the Collaborative Process and Its Effects on Perceived Outcomes during Emergency Response in China: From Perspectives of Local Government Sectors

Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19

Does Citizen Engagement With Government Social Media Accounts Differ During the Different Stages of Public Health Crises? An Empirical Examination of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Communicating COVID-19: Analyzing Higher Education Institutional Responses in Canada, China, and the USA

Collaborative Leadership, Collective Action, and Community Governance against Public Health Crises under Uncertainty: A Case Study of the Quanjingwan Community in China

Factors Influencing International Collaboration on the Prevention of COVID-19

From bureaucratic administration to effective intervention: Comparing early governmental responses to the COVID-19 virus across East Asian and western health systems

Why do democracies respond differently to COVID-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea