Abstract:Decision making is concerned with evaluating and/or ranking possible alternatives of action. In this paper, we develop a model for the process of decision making. Understanding the decision process can provide insights into how humans make decisions, understand their decision making approaches, and how they differ from each other. We believe that decision makers who are conscious of their decision process types can make more effective and balanced decisions. In this paper, we present a new decision process model based on the following four dimensions where each dimension is defined by two opposing types: Information Processing (Concrete and Abstract), Alternative Generation (Adaptive and Constructive), Alternative Evaluation (Moderate and Bold), and Decision Closure (Organized and Flexible). Furthermore, an approach for assessing each of the four decision process types by a mathematical function is presented. In a much boarder scope than decision making, these assessed functions can be used to evaluate and rank alternatives. The decision process model can also be used in conjunction with multiple criteria decision making and multiple objective optimization. The model can also be used to explain the reasons that the classical decision making models fail to describe real decision makers’ behavior, and mistakenly label such behavior as irrational. The proposed decision process model can be used for developing new behavioral, rational, and intelligent decision making theories and approaches. Extensions of this work may include group decision making, organizational decision making, team formation, and risk behavior analysis. Experimental results of over four hundred engineering students are reported. A web site has been developed for users (http://car.cwru.edu/decision/).

Rational and Intuitive Decision Making Style

INTEGRATED USE OF RATIONAL AND INTUITIVE DECISION MAKING STYLE: MODERN TRENDS IN ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION MAKING

Intuitive Decision-making：Research Status and Prospects

The Development and Validation of the Rational and Intuitive Decision Styles Scale

Intuition in managers

Rationality without Optimization: Bounded Rationality

Demystifying Intuitional and Rational Decision-Marking: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Analysis

A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.

Analysis of the Influence of Psychological Factors on Consumer behavior and the Decision-making Process

Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: The case of transitivity

Passionate rationalism: the role of emotion in decision making

The Myth of the Rational Decision Maker: A Framework for Applying and Enhancing Heuristic and Intuitive Decision Making by School Leaders

Rationality and Decisional Autonomy

The Performance Effects of Combining Rationality and Intuition in Making Early New Product Idea Evaluation Decisions

Designing for decision making

Meta‐analytic Investigations of the Relation Between Intuition and Analysis

RATIONAL THOUGHT AND RATIONAL BEHAVIOR: A REVIEW OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: THE ADAPTIVE TOOLBOX

Apparently Irrational Choice as Optimal Sequential Decision Making

Decision making process: typology, intelligence, and optimization

Intuition Versus Deliberation

Do smart people have better intuitions?