Abstract:With the development of digital technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, many organizations try to introduce AI algorithms into the decision-making process to avoid the subjective inherent biases. Although AI algorithms improve the scientificity of decision-making, they also raise the issue of fairness in the decision-making process. Considering that employees are the direct subject of HR decision-making, how employees view and evaluate the fairness of AI algorithmic decision-making process is very important. However, researches on the above questions are rather limited.Based on the procedural fairness theory, this study discusses the impact of different decision-making subjects (AI algorithms vs. supervisors) on employees’ perception of fairness in the HR decision-making process. Through two experiments, we find that: (1) The decision-making of AI algorithms makes employees have a lower perception of procedural fairness than that of supervisors. (2) Information transparency mediates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. Employees believe that AI algorithmic decision-making has lower information transparency, which in turn produces a lower perception of procedural fairness. (3) Inclusive climate moderates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. When employees perceive a high level of organizational inclusive climate, the effect of AI algorithmic decision-making on the perception of program fairness will be weakened.Overall, this study responds to the call for more research that bridges AI algorithmic decision-making and individual perception of procedural fairness by examining information transparency as a mediator and inclusive climate as a moderator in this relationship. The findings not only challenge the existing mainstream view that AI algorithmic decision-making does not exist a lower bias than human decision-making, but also offer useful advice to managers and provide implications for organizational HR decision-making practices in the digital and intelligent era.

Ethical AI in Financial Inclusion: The Role of Algorithmic Fairness on User Satisfaction and Recommendation

How Artificial Intelligence Effect the Fairness of Financial Industry

Standardizing fairness-evaluation procedures: interdisciplinary insights on machine learning algorithms in creditworthiness assessments for small personal loans

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Fairness and Explanation in AI-Informed Decision Making

Towards Responsible AI: A Design Space Exploration of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence User Interfaces to Investigate Fairness

Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making

Discussing ethical considerations and solutions for ensuring fairness in AI-driven financial services

Can AI Algorithmic Decision-making Improve Employees’ Perception of Procedural Fairness?

Social Trust and Algorithmic Equity: the Societal Perspectives of Users' Intention to Interact with Algorithm Recommendation Systems

Peer-induced Fairness: A Causal Approach for Algorithmic Fairness Auditing

Fairness Assessment for Artificial Intelligence in Financial Industry

User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalized AI System:Perceptual Evaluation of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Explainability

Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective

How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness

Fairness in Recommendation: A Survey

On the Current and Emerging Challenges of Developing Fair and Ethical AI Solutions in Financial Services

Are algorithms always fair? The study on public preferences toward algorithmic decision‐making: A case study from the perspectives of decision scenarios and social roles

Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systems

EARN Fairness: Explaining, Asking, Reviewing and Negotiating Artificial Intelligence Fairness Metrics Among Stakeholders

Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications