44 Years of FFU Synthetic Railway Sleeper

Günther Koller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20240903.11
2024-09-20
American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Abstract:In the 1970s, FFU (Fibre Reinforced Foamed Urethane) was developed by Japanese Railways in collaboration with Sekisui Chemical Co. Ltd. This technical report provides an overview of the production process and summarizes various material performance tests conducted by technical universities in Europe. Additionally, it addresses the lateral track resistance of German Railways before ballast compression and after more than 20 million load tonnes had been applied, compacting the ballast. To implement this technology in Finland, a full-body performance test at minus 65 degrees Celsius was required by the client. Meanwhile, the city of Warsaw's public transport operator requested a test to simulate vandalism fire scenarios under bridges and FFU sleepers. In 2010, 30 years after the first installation, the Railway Technical Research Institute (RTRI) of Japan retrieved sleepers from test tracks to assess their performance. The results showed that the sleepers were still in excellent condition, prompting RTRI to inform Japanese Railways that the technology could safely be used for another 20 years, reaffirming the proposed 50-year lifespan. Furthermore, the Technical University of Graz in Austria conducted a life cycle cost analysis for various countries, focusing on the use of FFU sleepers on bridges with open steel decks. For Germany, the study calculated an effective domestic interest rate of 25% for German Railway bridges, indicating strong economic viability. From a safety perspective, TNO, a Dutch research institute, examined the effects of FFU dust during on-site operations such as sawing and drilling. The results confirmed that working with FFU materials poses less risk compared to traditional wood, making it a safer option for on-site workers. This compilation of test results and real-world performance data highlights the reliability, longevity, and safety advantages of FFU technology for railway applications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?