Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAK) in Combination with Methotrexate for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nashwa Essam Dyab,Areej Alkhalil Al Hurh,Aya Mudar Knifaty,Eman Wagih Mahdy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sb.2024.v10i07.002
2024-08-22
Scholars Bulletin
Abstract:Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis is a major public health concern, affecting 0.46% of general population. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK) emerged as new biological drug for RA management. However, there is limited literature on effectiveness and safety of JAKi in combination therapy for RA management. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of JAKi in combination therapy with MTX as compared to MTX alone among RA patients. Methods: The recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols to fulfil research aims. Three electronic databases named as PubMed, Cochrane library and clinical trials.gov were used for research articles extraction. Primary outcomes were American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20 response), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), and adverse events (TEAE). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of each included randomized clinical trials. The pooled analysis was conducted by using RevMan (Review Manager) software version 5.4. Results: About 407 research articles were extracted from electronic databases and only 9 RCT’s met the inclusion criteria. About 9 RCT’s and 6853 RA patients met the inclusion criteria with 5040 patients receiving JAKi plus MTX in combination and 1813 patients receiving MTX in monotherapy. The pooled analysis showed that ACR20 have significantly improved among group receiving combination therapy as compared to MTX alone (Placebo) [OR: 2.44 (1.35 to 4.40) Cl: 95%] while TEAE numbers have favored the MTX alone as compared to group receiving combination therapy [RR: 1.29 (0.89 to 1.87) Cl: 95%], because number of adverse events were higher among treatment group. Moreover, the mean difference showed that HAQ DI [Mean difference: -0.53 (0.94 to -0.11) Cl: 95%], DAS28 [Mean difference: -1.85 (-2.83 to -0.86) Cl: 95%] have significantly decreased among group receiving combination therapy as compared to MTX alone (Placebo). Conclusion: Overall, the findings of recent meta-analysis revealed that JAKi in combination therapy with MTX improved the ACR20 responses, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and mean creatinine levels, as compared to MTX alone among RA patients. However, the frequency of adverse events by JAKi plus MTX was higher as compared to MTX alone that compromised the safety profile of combination therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?