Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Javier Narváez,Martí Aguilar-Coll,Montserrat Roig-Kim,Pol Maymó-Paituvi,Judith Palacios-Olid,Joan Miquel Nolla,Dídac LLop
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103636
Abstract:Objective: The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results: The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi. Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57-3.58; p = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11-4.12; p < 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01-0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01-0.11). Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08-0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %. The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14-0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles. Conclusion: JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?