Abstract:fields of building energy code development and energy labeling programs where building simulation plays a key role, there are also confusing and misleading claims that some BEMPs are better than others. In order to address these problems, it is essential to identify and understand differences between widely-used BEMPs, and the impact of these differences on load simulation results, by detailed comparisons of these BEMPs from source code to results. The primary goal of this work was to research methods and processes that would allow a thorough scientific comparison of the BEMPs. The secondary goal was to provide a list of strengths and weaknesses for each BEMP, based on in-depth understandings of their modeling capabilities, mathematical algorithms, advantages and limitations. This is to guide the use of BEMPs in the design and retrofit of buildings, especially to support China’s building energy standard development and energy labeling program. The research findings could also serve as a good reference to improve the modeling capabilities and applications of the three BEMPs. The methodologies, processes, and analyses employed in the comparison work could also be used to compare other programs. The load calculation method of each program was analyzed and compared to identify the differences in solution algorithms, modeling assumptions and simplifications. Identifying inputs of each program and their default values or algorithms for load simulation was a critical step. These tend to be overlooked by users, but can lead to large discrepancies in simulation results. As weather data was an important input, weather file formats and weather variables used by each program were summarized. Some common mistakes in the weather data conversion process were discussed. ASHRAE Standard 140-2007 tests were carried out to test the fundamental modeling capabilities of the load calculations of the three BEMPs, where inputs for each test case were strictly defined and specified. The tests indicated that the cooling and heating load results of the three BEMPs fell mostly within the range of spread of results from other programs. Based on ASHRAE 140-2007 test results, the finer differences between DeST and EnergyPlus were further analyzed by designing and conducting additional tests. Potential key influencing factors (such as internal gains, air infiltration, convection coefficients of windows and opaque surfaces) were added one at a time to a simple base case with an analytical solution, to compare their relative impacts on load calculation results. Finally, special tests were designed and conducted aiming to ascertain the potential limitations of each program to perform accurate load calculations. The heat balance module was tested for both single and double zone cases. Furthermore, cooling and heating load calculations were compared between the three programs by varying the heat transfer between adjacent zones, the occupancy of the building, and the air-conditioning schedule.

Comparative Analysis of Cooling Load Calculations: CLTD Method vs. Carrier HAP 5.01 Software for Hotel HVAC Design

Designing of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System for Workshop Building in Hot and Humid Climatic Zone Using CLTD Method and HAP Analysis: A Comparison

Method of Defining Heating and Cooling Period for Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Zone

Cooling loads for nonresidential buildings based on programmable, charted, look-up-tabulated radiant time series procedure

A simplified cooling load calculation method based on equivalent heat transfer coefficient for large space buildings with a stratified air-conditioning system

Numerical analysis on design cooling load reduction ratio of stratified air conditioning system in airport terminal buildings

Cooling Load for the Design of Air Terminals in a General Non-Uniform Indoor Environment Oriented to Local Requirements

Research On Cooling Load Of Typical Commercial Office Buildings In Beijing And Hong Kong

Analysis of Cooling Load Characteristics in Chinese Residential Districts for HVAC System Design

A Study On Air-Conditioning Load Of S Residence Unit By Comparison With Rc Unit

Comparison of Four Methods to Generate Typical Summer Days Using in HVAC Design (HO-18-C056)

Three computational methods for analysing thermal airflow distributions in the cooling of data centres

Performance comparison between temperature and humidity independent control and conventional air conditioning systems

Comparison of Building Energy Modeling Programs: HVAC Systems

A Quantitative Relationship Between Heat Gain and Local Cooling Load in a General Non-Uniform Indoor Environment

ANALYSIS OF THE THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF DIRECT-CONTACT AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS

Comprehensive and quantitative evaluation for selecting a suitable scheme of central air-conditioning during the design phase

Numerical Assessment of Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients in Buildings Conditioned by Parallel Split Systems

Design and Development of Performance Rating Apparatus for Cold Room Refrigeration Unit Using Cooling-Load Balance Method

A study on HVAC scheme design simulation methodology

Full-scale numerical simulation and experimental validation of the thermal environment under the heating mode in an air-conditioned room