Abstract:_ This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper IPTC 22867, “Automatic Lithology Classification of Cuttings With Deep Learning,” by Takashi Nanjo, Akira Ebitani, and Kazuaki Ishikawa, Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Copyright 2023 International Petroleum Technology Conference. Reproduced by permission. _ Wellsite geologists spend approximately 70% of their time on cuttings descriptions. In addition, two or three wellsite geologists generally are assigned to a drilling campaign, to be replaced at the end of a shift. Machine-learning (ML) and artificial-intelligence (AI) techniques have the potential to solve these issues because of their advantages in prediction speed, objectivity, and consistency. The authors’ aim is to automate the task of cuttings descriptions with these techniques. A trained model for cuttings description has the potential to realize quantitative, high-speed cuttings description. Methods and Materials Six wells were selected for this study (Poseidon-1, Ichthys2A ST-1, Ichthys2A ST-2, Dinichthys north1, Ichthys north1, and Ichthys north1 ST1). The wells were drilled in the Browse Basin through various lithologies. The authors focused on four lithologies (carbonate, sandstone, mudstone, and volcanic) and collected the cuttings from these lithologies. The total number of cuttings was 160 (21 carbonate, 58 sandstone, 52 mudstone, and 29 volcanic). The cuttings were used in their original dry condition. Each cutting was transported to a Petri plate in a random and sparse layout using tweezers. A stereomicroscope and a digital camera were prepared. Magnification was 6.3X, and picture size was 1,600 pixels in width and 1,200 pixels in height. Pictures were taken randomly, with approximately 20 photographs for each sample. The annotation was conducted by geologists using annotation software. Five label classes were used (sandstone, mudstone, carbonate, volcanic, and background). The total number of annotation data was 1,978. The annotated data were split as training label data, validation label data, and test label data. The pictures were also split as training data, validation data, and test data. The picture and label data were paired. In this study, 1,496 pictures and label data were used as training data sets, 320 pictures and label data were used as validation data, and 162 pictures and label data were used as test data. Four architectures of semantic segmentation were created (PSPNet, Unet, FPN, and Linknet), including two different networks (ResNet152 and EfficientNetB7), and training models were created. The total number of trained models was eight. As a result, the combination of PSPNet and EfficientNetB7 showed the best performance. The combination of PSPNet and EfficientNetB7 was chosen as the architecture of this project. Hyperparameters were chosen in the best practice case. Mean intersection over union (IOU) was used as the model evaluation index.

LiOBIA: Object-Based Cuttings Image Analysis for Automated Lithology Evaluation

Image Processing and Machine Learning Applied to Lithology Identification, Classification and Quantification of Thin Section Cutting Samples

Machine-Learning Techniques Classify, Quantify Cuttings Lithology

Advancing Subsurface Analysis: Integrating Computer Vision and Deep Learning for Near Real-Time Interpretation of Borehole Image Logs in the Illinois Basin Decatur Project

Automated litho-fluid and facies classification in well-logs: the Rock Physics perspective

An ensemble-based machine learning solution for imbalanced multiclass dataset during lithology log generation

Sedimentology from Wellbore to 3-D Reservoir with High-Definition Borehole Images in Both Water-Based and Oil-Based Muds

A New Approach for Cuttings Identification Using Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Integrated Carbonate Lithofacies Modeling Based on the Deep Learning and Seismic Inversion and Its Application

Evaluation of machine learning methods for lithology classification using geophysical data

Identification of Forested Landslides Using LiDar Data, Object-based Image Analysis, and Machine Learning Algorithms

Automation in Cuttings Analysis: Futuristic Preview of Digital Enablement for Geology 101

ORALI: Open-set recognition and active learning for unknown lithology identification

LITHOCODIUM MOUND IDENTIFICATION USING LWD IMAGE LOG AND QUANTIFIED CUTTING ANALYSIS VALIDATION WITH ANALOGUES

Centimeter-Scale Lithology and Facies Prediction in Cored Wells Using Machine Learning

High-resolution Linear CCD Application in the Recognition of Cuttings' Lithology Category

Deep Learning Meets OBIA: Tasks, Challenges, Strategies, and Perspectives

Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination

An automatic identification method of imbalanced lithology based on Deep Forest and K-means SMOTE

An improved lithology identification approach based on representation enhancement by logging feature decomposition, selection and transformation

An efficient, consistent, and trackable method to quantify organic matter–hosted porosity from ion-milled scanning electron microscope images of mudrock gas reservoirs