Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>"Culture" is a word frequently invoked within medical education literature to explain challenges faced by learners in practice. While social settings and practices are widely acknowledged as critical influences on medical education, there is vast variability in how the term "culture" is employed. This may lead to confusion, resulting in assumptions and oversights.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>This critical literature review aims to characterise how the term "culture" is explicitly and implicitly conceptualised in medical education research.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Four leading English language journals in the medical education field were searched in a twelve‐month period for research papers or reviews that mentioned culture in title or abstract in a substantive way. A content analysis was undertaken of extracted definitions. In addition, metaphor analysis was used to identify conceptual metaphors, which were subsequently clustered thematically.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Our search yielded 26 papers, 8 of which contained definitions, mostly from the organisational literature. We interpreted nine conceptual metaphors related to how the term culture was employed (terroir, divider, dominant force, toxic force, obstacle, microclimate, object, brand and holdall) in four categories (unchanging, powerful, can adapt around, can be used).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Discussion</h3><p>This critical review reveals that medical education as a field: 1) draws most explicitly from the organisational literature; 2) invokes culture in multiple means but in ways that privilege a‐contextual human agency or all‐powerful social forces; and 3) regards culture as a negative or neutral force but rarely a positive one. There is a notable absence around conceptualisations of culture that allow educators, students and administrators agency but at the same time acknowledge the deep forces that various social settings and practices exert. Other literatures investigating learning cultures and cultural reflexivity focus on this nexus and may provide possible means to advance considerations of culture within medical education research.</p></section>

Five Adjectives to Convey What Good Research Culture Looks Like

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

Nurturing a positive research culture within your organization

Nurturing a positive research culture within your laboratory

The 5 R's: an emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world

Towards a Democratic University: A call for Reflexive Evaluation and a Participative Culture

We must discuss research environments

Invoking culture in medical education research: A critical review and metaphor analysis

Co-Creation: A Novel Approach to Developing Guidelines for Research Integrity Policy – Lessons Learned from the SOPS4RI Project

Fostering a Creativity Culture

What Is Quality in Research? Building a Framework of Design, Process and Impact Attributes and Evaluation Perspectives

The Challenges for Graphic Design in Establishing an Academic Research Culture: Lessons from the Research Excellence Framework 2014

The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Research Communicators

The European Federation of the Pharmaceutical Industry and Associations’ Research and Animal Welfare Group: Assessing and benchmarking ‘Culture of Care’ in the context of using animals for scientific purpose

Torn Between Expectations and Imagination: Alternative Forms of Communicating Educational Research

Mind the gap: rigour and relevance in collaborative heritage science research

Culture of care in animal research – Expanding the 3Rs to include people

The Four Pillars of Research Software Engineering

Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity

In wood and word, or, a gloss on documents and documentation in the humanities

Thinking about the nature of research findings: a hermeneutic phenomenological perspective