Research culture in biomedicine: what we learned, and what we would like to do about it

Alexa T. McCray,David Van Vactor,James Gould,Xiuqi Li,Jelena Patrnogić,Caroline Shamu,Mary C. Walsh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06237-y

IF: 6.548

2024-05-09

Communications Biology

Abstract:The significant stressors that affect the biomedical research community have the potential to negatively impact the conduct of science. Here we report on work done at Harvard Medical School to identify areas for improvement in research rigor, reproducibility, and responsibility in pursuit of continued research excellence. This comment reports on work done at Harvard Medical School to identify areas for improvement in research rigor, reproducibility, and responsibility in pursuit of continued research excellence.

biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the negative impact of significant stress factors existing in the biomedical research community on scientific research. Specifically, these stress factors may affect the rigor, reproducibility, and responsibility (R3) of research, and further affect the reliability of research and the public's trust in science. The paper reports on the work done by Harvard Medical School in identifying areas in need of improvement in research, aiming to pursue continuous research excellence by enhancing the rigor, reproducibility, and responsibility of research.

The paper explores in detail the following aspects:

1. **Laboratory Culture**: It discusses how to establish and support a positive and healthy laboratory culture, emphasizes the importance of respect, diversity, and open communication, and proposes suggestions such as creating laboratory manuals.

2. **Training and Mentoring**: It explores whether Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training is the optimal method and how to better translate theoretical knowledge in the classroom into applications in daily laboratory practice. At the same time, it discusses methods to strengthen mentoring relationships, including different mentoring models and providing continuous mentoring training.

3. **Questionable Research Practices**: It discusses how to help laboratory members identify situations and actions that may lead to questionable research practices before problems occur, emphasizing the importance of prevention over remediation.

4. **Transparency of Research Results**: It discusses the importance of data preparation and management to promote the reproducibility of future research and publicly share these data and materials to make them most useful to other researchers.

5. **Institutional Support and Recognition**: It discusses how to provide continuous institutional support, including support for data management, and how to evaluate and reward rigorous and transparent research practices as part of promotion and tenure decisions.

In summary, this paper aims to improve the culture of biomedical research through efforts in the above aspects, thereby enhancing the quality and reliability of research.