Abstract:The study used network analysis to examine the properties of the five domains (negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 items in the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Adults (N = 502) from the general Australian community completed the PID-5-BF. Network analysis involving the five domains (including age and gender as covariates) indicated that negative affectivity was the most central domain, followed by psychoticism. For the edges, the effect sizes were moderate for negative affectivity with detachment and psychoticism, and disinhibition with psychoticism. The network analysis that involved the 25 PID-5-BF items indicated that the most central items were “irresponsible” (in the disinhibition domain), followed in sequence by “worry” and “emotional easily” (both in the negative affectivity domain). Within the different domains, the most central items for negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism domains were “worry,” “not close to people,” “take advantage of others,” “irresponsible,” and “things unreal/more real,” respectively. There were more significant within-domain and less significant cross-domain associations for negative affectivity, disinhibition, and psychoticism. Overall, our study has revealed possible trait-to-trait and behavior-to-behavior relationships that could underlie the interaction of the behaviors and traits associated generally with personality disorders, and the specific traits and behaviors that are most influential in triggering and activating personality disorders. Most critically, our findings indicated that individuals with more serious problems related to being irresponsible, worry and getting upset easily are more likely to demonstrate or to be at risk for severe personality psychopathology and personality disorders. La présente étude a utilisé l’analyse de réseau pour examiner les propriétés des cinq domaines (affect négatif, détachement, antagonisme, désinhibition et psychoticisme) et les 25 items de l’Inventaire de personnalité pour le Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux, cinquième édition, forme brève (PID-5-BF). Des adultes (N = 502) issus de la communauté australienne ont rempli le PID-5-BF. L’analyse de réseau impliquant les cinq domaines (y compris l’âge et le sexe comme covariables) a indiqué que l’affect négatif était le domaine le plus central, suivi par le psychoticisme. En périphérie, les tailles d’effet étaient modérées pour l’affect négatif avec le détachement et le psychoticisme, et pour la désinhibition avec le psychoticisme. L’analyse de réseau impliquant les 25 items du PID-5-BF indique que les items les plus centraux sont « irresponsable » (dans le domaine de la désinhibition), suivi dans l’ordre par « inquiétude » et « facilité émotionnelle » (tous deux dans le domaine de l’affect négatif). Dans les différents domaines, les éléments les plus centraux pour l’affect négatif, le détachement, l’antagonisme, la désinhibition et le psychoticisme étaient respectivement « inquiétude », « pas proche des gens », « profiter des autres », « irresponsable » et « choses irréelles/plus réelles ». Les associations intradomaine sont plus significatives et les associations interdomaines moins significatives pour l’affect négatif, la désinhibition et le psychoticisme. Dans l’ensemble, notre étude a révélé des relations possibles entre les traits et les comportements qui pourraient sous-tendre l’interaction entre les comportements et les traits généralement associés aux troubles de la personnalité et les traits et comportements spécifiques qui sont les plus influents dans le déclenchement et l’activation des troubles de la personnalité. Plus important encore, nos résultats indiquent que les individus ayant des problèmes plus graves liés à l’irresponsabilité, à l’inquiétude et au fait de s’énerver facilement sont plus susceptibles de présenter ou de risquer de présenter une psychopathologie grave de la personnalité et des troubles de la personnalité.

The sensitivity of the ICD‐11 trait model to the symptoms of clinical disorders in young adults

Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5– Brief Form Plus, Modified

Examining the validity and factor structure of the ICD-11 trait domains.

Validation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) with Iranian University Students and Clinical Samples: Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Convergent, Discriminant, and Known-Groups Validity

Examining the reliability and validity of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity diagnosis

The Hierarchical Structure and Predictive Validity of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> in Chinese Nonclinical Adolescents

The Hierarchical Structure and Predictive Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Chinese Nonclinical Adolescents

Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications

The structure of pathological personality traits and temperament in a Persian community sample

Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in China: Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Trait Structure and Continuity With Personality Disorder Types

A meta-structure for DSM-5 and ICD-11 pathological traits and the differentiation of personality functioning at different trait levels in older adults

Validating the German version of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale using nominal response models.

Severity in the ICD-11 personality disorder model: Evaluation in a Spanish mixed sample

Internalizing psychopathology and its links to suicidal ideation, dysfunctional attitudes, and help-seeking readiness in a national sample of college students

Personality dimensions emerging during adolescence and young adulthood are underpinned by a single latent trait indexing impairment in social functioning

Comprehensive meta-analysis of associations between temperament and character traits in Cloninger’s psychobiological theory and mental disorders

Development and Validation of Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) Algorithms to Assess ICD-11 Personality Trait Domain Qualifiers

Personality traits are differently associated with depression and anxiety: Evidence from applying bivariate multiple binary logistic regression on a large sample of general adults

Verification of five‐factor models and reference scores for personality dysfunction and trait domains of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD‐11 (PAQ‐11), revised version

Avoidant personality disorder through the lens of ICD 11

Network analyses of the domains and items of Personality Inventory for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition–Brief Form (PID-5-BF).