Abstract:The study used network analysis to examine the properties of the five domains (negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 items in the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Adults (N = 502) from the general Australian community completed the PID-5-BF. Network analysis involving the five domains (including age and gender as covariates) indicated that negative affectivity was the most central domain, followed by psychoticism. For the edges, the effect sizes were moderate for negative affectivity with detachment and psychoticism, and disinhibition with psychoticism. The network analysis that involved the 25 PID-5-BF items indicated that the most central items were “irresponsible” (in the disinhibition domain), followed in sequence by “worry” and “emotional easily” (both in the negative affectivity domain). Within the different domains, the most central items for negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism domains were “worry,” “not close to people,” “take advantage of others,” “irresponsible,” and “things unreal/more real,” respectively. There were more significant within-domain and less significant cross-domain associations for negative affectivity, disinhibition, and psychoticism. Overall, our study has revealed possible trait-to-trait and behavior-to-behavior relationships that could underlie the interaction of the behaviors and traits associated generally with personality disorders, and the specific traits and behaviors that are most influential in triggering and activating personality disorders. Most critically, our findings indicated that individuals with more serious problems related to being irresponsible, worry and getting upset easily are more likely to demonstrate or to be at risk for severe personality psychopathology and personality disorders. La présente étude a utilisé l’analyse de réseau pour examiner les propriétés des cinq domaines (affect négatif, détachement, antagonisme, désinhibition et psychoticisme) et les 25 items de l’Inventaire de personnalité pour le Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux, cinquième édition, forme brève (PID-5-BF). Des adultes (N = 502) issus de la communauté australienne ont rempli le PID-5-BF. L’analyse de réseau impliquant les cinq domaines (y compris l’âge et le sexe comme covariables) a indiqué que l’affect négatif était le domaine le plus central, suivi par le psychoticisme. En périphérie, les tailles d’effet étaient modérées pour l’affect négatif avec le détachement et le psychoticisme, et pour la désinhibition avec le psychoticisme. L’analyse de réseau impliquant les 25 items du PID-5-BF indique que les items les plus centraux sont « irresponsable » (dans le domaine de la désinhibition), suivi dans l’ordre par « inquiétude » et « facilité émotionnelle » (tous deux dans le domaine de l’affect négatif). Dans les différents domaines, les éléments les plus centraux pour l’affect négatif, le détachement, l’antagonisme, la désinhibition et le psychoticisme étaient respectivement « inquiétude », « pas proche des gens », « profiter des autres », « irresponsable » et « choses irréelles/plus réelles ». Les associations intradomaine sont plus significatives et les associations interdomaines moins significatives pour l’affect négatif, la désinhibition et le psychoticisme. Dans l’ensemble, notre étude a révélé des relations possibles entre les traits et les comportements qui pourraient sous-tendre l’interaction entre les comportements et les traits généralement associés aux troubles de la personnalité et les traits et comportements spécifiques qui sont les plus influents dans le déclenchement et l’activation des troubles de la personnalité. Plus important encore, nos résultats indiquent que les individus ayant des problèmes plus graves liés à l’irresponsabilité, à l’inquiétude et au fait de s’énerver facilement sont plus susceptibles de présenter ou de risquer de présenter une psychopathologie grave de la personnalité et des troubles de la personnalité.

Do PID-5 Trait Scores Predict Symptom Disorders? A Meta-analytic Review

High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD.

Bridging the ICD11 and the DSM-5 personality disorders classification systems: The role of the PID5BF + M

Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 across U.S. East Asian, Southeast Asian, and White participants.

Pathological personality traits modulate neural interactions

Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across sex

Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.

Examining the validity and factor structure of the ICD-11 trait domains.

Network analyses of the domains and items of Personality Inventory for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition–Brief Form (PID-5-BF).

Sex and pathological personality traits: measurement invariance and comparisons

Psychometric Properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form in a Community Sample with High Rates of Trauma Exposure

Exploring the Assessment of the DSM–5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders With the Personality Assessment Inventory

Anankastia or Psychoticism? Which One Is Better Suited for the Fifth Trait in the Pathological Big Five: Insight From the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Perspective

Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5– Brief Form Plus, Modified

Trait Variance and Response Style Variance in the Scales of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5)

Comparing DSM-5 pathological personality traits in eating disorder patients and healthy control subjects using PID-5: results of a pilot study

Assessment of personality disorder in the ICD-11 diagnostic system: Polish validation of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11

A comparison of the associations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II personality disorders and Section III personality domains with clinical dysfunction in a psychiatric patient sample.

DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.

More is more: Evidence for the incremental value of the SCID-II/SCID-5-PD specific factors over and above a general personality disorder factor.

Validation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) with Iranian University Students and Clinical Samples: Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Convergent, Discriminant, and Known-Groups Validity