Reliable measures of rest-activity rhythm fragmentation: how many days are needed?

Ian Meneghel Danilevicz,Sam Vidil,Benjamin Landré,Aline Dugravot,Vincent Theodor van Hees,Séverine Sabia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00364-5
2024-10-20
European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity
Abstract:A more fragmented, less stable rest-activity rhythm (RAR) is emerging as a risk factor for health. Accelerometer devices are increasingly used to measure RAR fragmentation using metrics such as inter-daily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), transition probabilities (TP), self-similarity parameter (α), and activity balance index (ABI). These metrics were proposed in the context of long period of wear but, in real life, non-wear might introduce measurement bias. This study aims to determine the minimum number of valid days to obtain reliable fragmentation metrics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?