Abstract:Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on students' learning experiences and perceptions through a master’s-level course. The study specifically focused on student engagement, comfort with GenAI and ethical considerations. Design/methodology/approach The study used an action research methodology employing qualitative data collection methods, including pre- and post-course surveys, reflective assignments, class discussions and a questionnaire. The AI-Ideas, Connections, Extensions (ICE) Framework, combining the ICE Model and AI paradigms, is used to assess students' cognitive engagement with GenAI. Findings The study revealed that incorporating GenAI in a master’s-level instructional design course increased students' comfort with GenAI and their understanding of its ethical implications. The AI-ICE Framework demonstrated most students were at the initial engagement level, with growing awareness of GenAI’s limitations and ethical issues. Course reflections highlighted themes of improved teaching strategies, personal growth and the practical challenges of integrating GenAI responsibly. Research limitations/implications The small sample size poses challenges to the analytical power of the findings, potentially limiting the breadth and applicability of conclusions. This constraint may affect the generalizability of the results, as the participants may not fully represent the broader population of interest. The researchers are mindful of these limitations and suggest caution in interpreting the findings, acknowledging that they may offer more exploratory insights than definitive conclusions. Future research endeavors should aim to recruit a larger cohort to validate and expand upon the initial observations, ensuring a more robust understanding. Originality/value The study is original in its integration of GenAI into a master's-level instructional design course, assessing both the practical and ethical implications of its use in education. By utilizing the AI-ICE Framework to evaluate students' cognitive engagement and employing action research methodology, the study provides insights into how GenAI influences learning experiences and perceptions. This approach bridges the gap between theoretical understanding and the real-world application of GenAI, offering actionable strategies for its responsible use in educational settings.

Evolving intersections: AI, disability, and academic integrity in higher education

Exploring the integration of Generative AI in assessment in a tertiary context

Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives

Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption

Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice

Evaluating and Incorporating Generative AI in Nursing Informatics and Data Science Graduate Courses

Learning with Generative Artificial Intelligence Within a Network of Co-Regulation

Evaluating the impact of students' generative AI use in educational contexts

Guidelines for the Evolving Role of Generative AI in Introductory Programming Based on Emerging Practice

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Education: Assessment Redesign Principles and Considerations

Navigating challenges and opportunities: Nursing student's views on generative AI in higher education

Generative or Degenerative?! Implications of AI Tools in Pre-Service Teacher Education and Reflections on Instructors’ Professional Development

Impact of Generative AI in Academic Integrity and Learning Outcomes: A Case Study in the Upper East Region

Consensus or Controversy: Examining AI's Impact on Academic Integrity, Student Learning, and Inclusivity Within Higher Education Environments

Crafting Tomorrow's Evaluations: Assessment Design Strategies in the Era of Generative AI

Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions

AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI

Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in higher education: Strategies for mitigating bias and promoting fairness

Navigating the Grey Area: Students' Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI Tools for Coding Assignments

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing

Navigating the New Frontier: Recommendations to Address the Crisis and Potential of AI in the Classroom