Abstract:<span>Coach educators' voices rarely feature in the coaching literature. To address this gap, this research explored the journeys and perceptions and understandings of learning of 16 coach educators (tutors) in the United Kingdom (UK). As such, the research enabled the voices of these coach educators to be heard and their socialisation processes to be investigated. Semi-structured interviews were used to gain exploratory insights and the data were analysed thematically through inductive and deductive processes. Themes were identified that related to the coach educators' journeys and lives as well as their understandings of learning and coach education. To offer a theoretically informed and sophisticated appreciation of coach educators and coach education, the sociological framework of Pierre Bourdieu was adopted. The analysis showed the coach educators' beliefs and perceptions had been formed, inculcated and reproduced as a result of taken-for-granted and doxic experiences as athletes, learners and coaches and in coach education and tutor training (and tertiary education in some cases). The coach educators suggested that knowledge of 'learning' was important for coaching and coach education and associated it with contextualised and situated practice. The participants viewed the coach education they delivered to be decontextualised and to have low impact. Additionally, the findings suggested that coach educators may have limited pedagogical knowledge and conceptual understanding. The analysis typically positioned the professional coach educator habitus as being unreflective, unreflexive and compliant as they appropriated legitimate (but questionable) methods. The findings are significant in that they highlight the need to: (i) appreciate and explore coach educators' roles, contexts, experiences and understandings and (ii) conduct critical inquiry with coach developers, those occupying senior Sport Governing Body (SGB) positions, policymakers and stakeholders in order to enhance our knowledge of this complex but crucial practitioner and role, and ultimately tutor training and practice.</span>

‘(The unconscious) is a treasure box where coachees can find their answers’ – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of Jungian coaching

Jung's Psychology and Deleuze's Philosophy: The unconscious in learning

Existential Therapy and Jungian Analysis: Toward an Existential Depth Psychology

Unconscious phantasy: Some historical and conceptual dimensions

Existential–Jungian Analysis: Reconciling the Personal and Archetypal Realms in the Consulting Room

The Personal and The Transpersonal Psyche: Human Suffering, the Archetypes and the Clinical Encounter

Reconceptualising Intracareer Transitions as Coach-Becomings: A Rhizomatic Narrative Case Study of an American Basketball Coach

Working with the relational unconscious: an integration of intrapsychic and relational analysis

The adaptive unconscious in psychoanalysis

"A lifelong journey:" a phenomenological exploration of faculty perceptions about coach training at an academic medical center

Investigating the impact of a Freirean informed coach education programme

Exploring the value, enablers and barriers of being a clinician-coach: A qualitative pilot study of clinician-coaches in emergency medicine

Hiding in plain sight: Jung, astrology, and the psychology of the unconscious

Developing countertransference awareness as a therapist in training: The role of containing contexts

Exploring professional coach educators’ journeys and perceptions and understandings of learning

Finding unconscious phantasy in the session: Recognizing form

Unconscious phantasy as a structural principle and organizer of mental life: The evolution of a concept from Freud to Klein and some of her successors

The psychological unconscious. Found, lost, and regained.

Integration of psychobiography into professional training in clinical and counselling psychology: Strategies and prospects

Something has sort of opened up for me: psychology students' reflections after participating in an apprenticeship training model