Abstract:Importance: Little is known about the breadth of health care networks or the degree to which different insurers' networks overlap.Objective: To quantify network breadth and exclusivity (ie, overlap) among primary care physician (PCP), cardiology, and general acute care hospital networks for employer-based (large group and small group), individually purchased (marketplace), Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans.Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 1192 networks from Vericred. The analytic unit was the network-zip code-clinician type-market, which captured attributes of networks from the perspective of a hypothetical patient seeking access to in-network clinicians or hospitals within a 60-minute drive.Exposures: Enrollment in a private insurance plan.Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of in-network physicians and/or hospitals within a 60-minute drive from a hypothetical patient in a given zip code (breadth). Number of physicians and/or hospitals within each network that overlapped with other insurers' networks, expressed as a percentage of the total possible number of shared connections (exclusivity). Descriptive statistics (mean, quantiles) were produced overall and by network breadth category, as follows: extra-small (<10%), small (10%-25%), medium (25%-40%), large (40%-60%), and extra-large (>60%). Networks were analyzed by insurance type, state, and insurance, physician, and/or hospital market concentration level, as measured by the Hirschman-Herfindahl index.Results: Across all US zip code-network observations, 415 549 of 511 143 large-group PCP networks (81%) were large or extra-large compared with 138 485 of 202 702 MA (68%), 191 918 of 318 082 small-group (60%), 60 425 of 149 841 marketplace (40%), and 21 781 of 66 370 MMC (40%) networks. Large-group employer networks had broader coverage than all other network plans (mean [SD] PCP breadth: large-group employer-based plans, 57.3% [20.1]; small-group employer-based plans, 45.7% [21.4]; marketplace, 36,4% [21.2]; MMC, 32.3% [19.3]; MA, 47.4% [18.3]). MMC networks were the least exclusive (a mean [SD] overlap of 61.3% [10.5] for PCPs, 66.5% [9.8] for cardiology, and 60.2% [12.3] for hospitals). Networks were narrowest (mean [SD] breadth 42.4% [16.9]) and most exclusive (mean [SD] overlap 47.7% [23.0]) in California and broadest (79.9% [16.6]) and least exclusive (71.1% [14.6]) in Nebraska. Rising levels of insurer and market concentration were associated with broader and less exclusive networks. Markets with concentrated primary care and insurance markets had the broadest (median [interquartile range {IQR}], 75.0% [60.0%-83.1%]) and least exclusive (median [IQR], 63.7% [52.4%-73.7%]) primary care networks among large-group commercial plans, while markets with least concentration had the narrowest (median [IQR], 54.6% [46.8%-67.6%]) and most exclusive (median [IQR], 49.4% [41.9%-56.9%]) networks.Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, narrower health care networks had a relatively large degree of overlap with other networks in the same geographic area, while broader networks were associated with physician, hospital, and insurance market concentration. These results suggest that many patients could switch to a lower-cost, narrow network plan without losing in-network access to their PCP, although future research is needed to assess the implications for care quality and clinical integration across in-network health care professionals and facilities in narrow network plans.

So, you want to form a healthcare network - now what?

What are the reasons for clinical network success? A qualitative study

Creating a financially sound primary care network

Strategy and risk sharing in hospital-postacute care integration

Exploration of Network Facilitator Experiences Implementing Payer-Partner Programs within a Nationwide Clinically Integrated Network

Properties of Healthcare Teaming Networks as a Function of Network Construction Algorithms

A Path to Clinical Quality Integration Through a Clinically Integrated Network: The Experience of an Academic Health System and Its Community Affiliates

Development of a managed clinical network in oral medicine

Using a network organisational architecture to support the development of Learning Healthcare Systems

On Designing of a Low Leakage Patient-Centric Provider Network

Assessing Association Between Team Structure and Health Outcome and Cost by Social Network Analysis

Physician Networks and Ambulatory Care-sensitive Admissions

Applying network analysis to assess the development and sustainability of multi-sector coalitions

What do we think we are doing? How might a clinical information network be promoting implementation of recommended paediatric care practices in Kenyan hospitals?

Building for Value: A Foundational Structure to Support Population Health

The hospital-physician computer communications network: an alternative application

The shift from vertical to networked integration, Part 1

Breadth and Exclusivity of Hospital and Physician Networks in US Insurance Markets

Collaboration Through Clinical Integration

Hospitals Participating In ACOs Tend To Be Large And Urban, Allowing Access To Capital And Data

A Path to Risk: Critical Elements of a Structured Approach