Abstract:Akin to many jurisdictions, Switzerland has a dual system of sanctions comprising sentences and measures. To order a therapeutic measure per Article 59 or 63 of the Swiss Criminal Code, the presence of a "severe mental disorder" must be determined. Before the new legal precedent, this required a medical diagnosis according to recognised classification systems like the ICD or DSM. The court then decided if a disorder was "severe" in the legal sense, thereby requiring such a therapeutic measure. However, in two 2019 rulings, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court concluded that a severe mental disorder could legally exist without a diagnosis according to the ICD or DSM, if it is based on offence- and risk-relevant personality-related factors amenable to risk-reducing therapy. We examine the details and context of the rulings, alongside their wider dangers. Specifically, we outline how undue influence could be exerted by non-ICD/DSM diagnostic systems, which were developed within individual theoretical schools of thought and lack empirical validation, like in these two court cases. Such non-manual diagnoses could make the presence of a severe mental disorder dependent upon whether an expert witness employs a particular diagnostic system, which would undermine principles of legality. Moreover, the Court's requirement that the disorder is based on personality-related risk factors amenable to risk-reducing therapy is problematic because research has highlighted the low effectiveness of treatment provided independently of a psychiatric disorder. Finally, broadening entry criteria may increase the number of offenders who require psychiatric treatment, thus endangering the quality of care for those with ICD/DSM-based diagnoses that are known to respond well to treatment (e.g. schizophrenia). In short, fulfilling the Court's request that any non-manual diagnoses are based on personality-related risk factors that are amenable to risk-reducing therapy is not possible for such non-manual diagnoses. Using unvalidated diagnoses could also render the system susceptible to ethical issues and hypothetical misuse, which may adversely affect society's most vulnerable people. To counter these dangers, we suggest that in order to be admissible in court, any diagnostic system must mandatorily fulfil sufficient scientific standards.

Criminal Responsibility For Perpetrators of Criminal Acts With Schizophrenic Mental Disorders

Various Level of Aggressive Behavior of Schizophrenia as a Basis of Criminal Responsibility

Relation Factors of the Criminal Responsibility in the Offenders with Mental Disorders by the Discriminatory Analysis

Criminal Law Reform In Criminal Responsibility For People In Mental Disorders Oriented To Dignified Justice

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyakit Bipolar dalam Penyebarluasan Tindak Pidana Pornografi

THE IMPACT OF SELECTED NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL BRAIN DYSFUNCTIONS ON THE CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERPETRATOR

A narrative review of international legislation regulating fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility: Is there a perfect system?

An integrated model for criminal responsibility in action: How Swedish criminal law operates without an insanity defence

The Other Side of the Coin: Individuals Diagnosed with Schizophrenia as Victims of Crime and Violence

The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane

Matricide, parricide, and filicide: Are major mental disorders or personality disorders involved? Assessment of criminal responsibility in Brazilian cases

Impediments to Criminal Liability Arising from The Lack of Awareness in The Palestinian and Jordanian Legal Systems

Schizophrenia, human rights and access to health care: A systematic search and review of judgements by the European Court of Human Rights

A firearm double homicide committed by a paranoid neigh- bor: a psychopathological study

Overview Of Criminology And Criminal Law Concerning The Criminal Act Of Abuse Performed By Parents Against This Bird Children (Study Of The Decision Of The State Court Tulung Agung Number 179/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. Ta)

Mental Health Exemptions to Criminal Responsibility

The dangers of using diagnoses outside of established psychiatric nosology in the courtroom: Analysis and discussion of current Swiss legal precedent from a medical perspective

Analysis on the correlative characteristics of mental disorder patients with illegal behaviors

Juridical Analysis of Criminal Acts in Environmental Pollution in Accordance to the 32 Law of 2009 Concerning Protection and Management Environment

A review of the new provisions for sanctioning mentally disordered offenders in China, in a broader historical context

Legally involved individuals in state hospitals and community mental health settings: Introduction to the special section.